At exchange 11

hotspring's picture

Hello everyone.

Just wanted to let you all know that Goldenheart and I are plugging along at the exchanges. We're just finished exchange 11 so are pretty close to being able to get laid . . . if that's what we choose at that time.

I'll just mention the highlights. Firstoff, I've noticed that giving affectionate exchange on a regular basis creates more of a natural desire to do it. The affection starts to build on its own momentum and no longer feels forced. We've been very playful with one another, dancing and laughing. I laugh more with Goldenheart probably more than with any other person besides perhaps my mom.

I very much enjoyed the part of one exchange where we expressed our appreciation for one another in specific ways. It helped me to acknowledge how much I value GH despite any other confusions. I expressed appreciation for his smile, how it lit up his whole face and embodied his sunny personality; for his ability not to get thrown off course by any drama I throw his way - he doesn't take things personally unnecessarily, blow things out of proportion, or hold grudges; for his amazingly positive attitude . . . . I kept on thinking of more things I had to tell him I appreciated. He said he appreciated who I was on my own, as my own person; that I wasn't fake and was always direct; he said he appreciated my beauty on many levels; and that I wanted to help other people and was focused about my own self-learning, especially in regards to the body. I learn more and more how important quaility of verbal exchange is to me, so this practice was fun. This increased comfort in vulnerability has led him to have the confidence to call me his "beautiful sweetheart" before leaving, which I already know that I am in his eyes, but he was able to say it outloud and I could smile back at him and accept it without feeling like my indipendence is threatened (I know that's ridiculous!)

Speaking of threatened indipendence, I energetically forgave his penis for threatening mine years ago when we got pregnant. I know he didn't mean it, but his penis probably did, and I have been rather angry and resentful for what it did to me. I had my hand there and forgave it. Now, whether my yoni has forgiven it yet or not remains to be seen, but I consider this some progress in the right direction.

The kissing has improved only slightly, I'm afraid to say. If I won't have orgasms, at the very least I'd like some hot kissing. How dangerous could that be?

Another reader in this forum wrote me a few personal letters and I'm sorry I don't have the time for a personal correspondence, but I thought it worth mentioning here. She said that she thinks what Marnia is proposing as effective may only be effective if the relationship starts out with the exchanges, as Marnia's present marriage did. She said she wasn't sure that the exchanges could heal wounds or damage from the past or be effective in a relationship that had started off with fertilization-driven sex (this is the gist of it at least, feel free to chime in if I'm misquoting you, P.). Adding to this, she was hoping that by watching me experience the exchanges with GH, she might learn to have some last hope that her marriage could be saved, if him and I were sucessful, but she was a little dissapointed to see that while I had at first appeared to her to be a sexually liberated woman, the situation with GH was showing quite a different picture (again, this is the gist of it, not her exact words). The whole thing has actually shown, and these are my words to describe it, that I may be quite orgasmic but I am still quite emotionally guarded. Well, in this day and age, that's what liberation means: the ability to be free from having to consider anyone but oneself.

So, yes I have been selfish and foolish. What my exchanges with GH have shown me is that emotional liberation is very different from physical liberation, and that without the freedom to let someone in, care for them without feeling tied down, or receive love without feeling claustrophobic, I simply am not liberated no matter how many orgasms I can have, how many men profess being in love with me, how beautiful I am, etc etc. We're talking about two very different gauges for what constitutes liberation.

Firstoff what I would like to say, P., is that I really do not want to be the gauge by which anyone measures whether or not their marriage has any hope. You mention that you have not tried the exchanges yourself, and do not share on the forum. While I realize not everyone is as exhibitionistic as I am about the sometimes boring details of their lives, I do feel that if, for example, you would be willing to try the exchanges for yourself and share your journey, possibly you yourself could see whether or not your marriage can be saved and if indeed it can, you may have provided some of us here with some encouragement (or at the very least, entertainment) as well.

Even if these exchanges DO result in GH and I falling happily ever after in an oxytocin saturated bliss of cuddling cornucopia (which they may or may not), I wouldn't want anything I do to serve as hope in a hopeless world for anyone. I'd rather it serve as a sign of encouragement to proceed and take the leap - with your own experience. Hope seems to me like pining for something you don't quite believe is possible, or are unwilling to invest in. One could hope forever. Hope does not challenge experience. As much as I do like Barack Obama, I really must say that the ideology and rhetoric of hope for me is totally empty and dull. Luckily, we have much more of value to work with and depend on, right now, and not later. Hope does not exist for the present.

P. also raised two issues in her letter that I think are really worth bringing up, and which seem to not be broadcast as strongly as a message on this site, but which I think really need to be considered and talked about. The first one is that Marnia does not have kids, does not want to have kids, and does not think the human race is supposed to be focused on having kids right now. The second point is that Marnia thinks that it doesn't matter who your chosen partner is; one is as good as the other. This is putting it crassly, and I would love to hear Marnia's more eloquent version of it, if she hasn't already stated it somewhere else on the site and I missed it.

I realize this letter has a rather confrontational tone right now, but I don't mean it to be so. I'm simply feeling feisty. I sense that these topics are highly controversial and likely to be unpopular, which is why they haven't shown up as dominant parts of Marnias argument, eventhough they are very important.

I'd like to see these questions openly discussed, not because I doubt in any way that humans REALLY badly need to curb their procreative zeal, or because I doubt that every human is indeed lovable and worthy of love, but because I am wondering if what Marnia proposes in a sense, in its fullest sense, would be a challenge for me to hunker down and be happy with anyone, and choose not to have kids.

Now that will be a harder struggle than simply giving up orgasms, but the questions are particularly poignant to me right now because 1) at this point I would like to have kids and a family and so naturally as a consequence, 2) I find myself measuring every man I'm with in terms of whether or not he'd be a good father and life partner or not.

Things would be QUITE simple if I didn't want to have kids. It would save me much anxiety and heartache. If I did not want kids, I would not particularly care whether or not I found someone to stay with for life. Of course I'd prefer to find someone great to spend a lot of time with, perhaps a few years or decades, half a decade if things were going swimmingly, but the question of compatibility would have much less urgency behind it.

This begs the question of why a couple even should try to find a way to stay together if they are not going to have children.

Comments

Marnia's picture

I have things to say,

but I'd like to go last, so we hear from others first.

In any case, I like feistiness. Thanks for being you!

CuriousFellow's picture

Invitation to Hotspring's correspondent "P."

Please join in the discussion in this blog or the forums. There are several of us here that are trying to repair or improve our relationships. We can all benefit by sharing our experience and suggestions. We welcome you to join us here!

Since I don't know anything about your situation, at this point I can only offer some generic advice:

Check out the comments in reply to my first post at http://www.reuniting.info/node/1376. (See what awesome advice you can get by posting? Smiling)

I really like the book Love Busters by Dr. Willard Harley, available in most bookstores and on the site www.marriagebuilders.com.

There is some discussion about starting the Exchanges with an unwilling male partner at http://www.reuniting.info/node/1376.

Good luck, hope to see you posting here soon!

CuriousFellow's picture

Interesting questions...

I won't presume to advise anyone on whether they should have kids or not, but just report my own experience. I'm an only child. I have no idea why, but when I was small, I said I wanted to have 10 kids when I grew up! When I was in my teens and 20s, I just didn't think about the question of having kids very much. Getting into a stable relationship was a much more difficult and preoccupying problem at the time. I suppose I just assumed that I would have one or two kids, if I ever got married.

Then I moved in with (rented a room from) a family who had a 5-year old kid that I really didn't like very much - he was kind of a spoiled brat. It really turned me off to the idea of having kids. I even wrote to my parents, asking them why they decided to have me, and why I might want to have kids. My normally very logical father essentially admitted that it was not a logical decision but an emotional one. He said that if he hadn't had me, he probably would have felt that he had "missed out" on something. There were some other things that he and Mom wrote, but apparently the "missing out" argument was the one that made the strongest impression on me - although it was still not convincing to me at the time.

I got married, determined not to have kids, while Zoe very much wanted kids and was hopeful that I would change my mind. About four years later, she had pretty much resigned herself to not having kids, and meanwhile I gradually changed my mind and decided to have some. We ended up with two kids.

What can I say about it? Having kids is a HUGE committment. It's a lot of work, has a huge impact on your lifestyle (no more going out to see a movie or whatever on the spur of the moment - and you talk about "independence," Hotspring!), child caring time - putting them to bed and so on - takes away from your private time with your partner, it costs a lot of money, etc. It has a lot bigger impact on your life than getting married, or buying a house.

I don't regret it, though, and would probably do it again, knowing what I know now. And no, I can't justify having kids logically. But I might feel like I had "missed out" on something if I hadn't had them. Smiling

P.S. If you do plan to have kids, it would probably be a good idea to have some long discussions with the potential father, long before you make the committment, about how you will divvy up the child care tasks - feeding, changing diapers, etc., about how you will manage discipline, what are the rules of the house that the kids must abide by, and so on. There are books that go into that stuff, but I don't have any titles to recommend.

Mitsiky's picture

Thank you

Hotspring, I really appreciate this post, especially that you decided to bring up those assumptions. It sounds like you're learning a lot from this, all other considerations aside.

I just have one comment:

Hotspring wrote:
If I won't have orgasms, at the very least I'd like some hot kissing. How dangerous could that be?

Well, not dangerous, except that in my experience, the one will lead to the other, and if by some chance you resist, you will still be left with a tremendous case of sexual frustration. Not all good kissing is hot kissing.

CuriousFellow's picture

The other question... are people interchangable

as far as being suitable lovers and life partners is concerned? Or as a friend once put it, "Aren't all women alike in the dark?" Smiling (Actually, he seemed to have a happy and passionate marriage. He just had a good sense of humor.)

Certainly there are attributes that some of us would find unacceptable or unattractive in a potential mate:
- criminal behavior
- serious diseases and medical problems
- physical and mental disabilities
- "abrasive" personality
- "ugly" appearance
- etc.

I'm not saying people should or should not evaluate potential mates according to such attributes, I'm just saying we do.

The questions I'm interested in are, supposing a potential mate seems pretty "normal" - no attributes that are widely regarded as turn-offs - and yet there is no spark, no chemistry, no strong attraction. What's going on there? Why is there no, or little attraction? Would an attraction develop if you "worked on it", got to know the person better?

In some times and places, such as India and China, marriages were arranged by the couple's families. I daresay for most such couples, it was not love at first sight. And yet the custom worked well enough that it lasted for thousands of years.

Hotspring has complained that Goldenheart has a face like a boy, not a man. She also doesn't much like the way he kisses or touches her. Did she feel the same way when they were together years ago? (If not, then something has changed, but perhaps it could change back.) And other women might have no problem with the way he looks or the way he kisses, etc. Can HS somehow overcome her objections to GH, perhaps by thoroughly analyzing where those feelings of objection come from?

If I recall correctly, Gary had a drinking problem when Marnia first met him. But Gary got over that after many months. And now Marnia finds Gary just gets "cuter and cuter." How did she become attracted to that "diamond in the rough," and see through the rough exterior to the diamond within?

CuriousFellow's picture

...And would Marnia say

that all men are alike in the dark? Evil Evil Evil

Marnia's picture

I would certainly say

that every man I have loved looked adorable...in some way. It might have been his beard or his baldness or his voice or his pointed nose (in Gary's case), but that's the beauty of oxytocin. ANYone can look adorable. All those ridiculous magazines and cosmetic surgeries can go right on out of business, because there's a better way of guaranteeing "cuteness."

Marnia's picture

Like Mitsiky

I want to say that your experience is very inspiring, Hotspring. By walking through "the fire," you're seeing what's possible in terms of overcoming the projections onto a partner, which so easily arise. The difference in light-heartedness in your post is noticeable. That may seem like a small thing, but in terms of quality of life, it's a very powerful shift. Life can be pleasurable most of the time in that mindset...not just a constant drive to "get" one reward after the other - with lots of frustration and anxiety in between "hits" of satisfaction. Of course, it feels so natural when you're in this place, that you don't fully appreciate it until you go back on the roller coaster and the clouds gather repeatedly.

But enough dithering. I want to address your two main points directed to me.

First, I believe a lot of kids are had on this planet because people think they "should" have them, or that kids are "necessary to happiness." I think this is true even of people who would have been a lot happier pouring their energies into something else in a given lifetime. Thinking as part of a whole (humanity as a group), I think it is clear that mankind would be far better served if people did *not* produce children casually.

I do think we need close connections with others, and people to love unconditionally in our lives. I think our mental and physical health actually depend on this. Because of the fragility of intimate relationships, many people steer for kids in order to find that deeper nourishment. This is a rational decision...except when, as now, the planet is bursting at the seams with too many people, and an increasingly toxic environment. But it is also a decision that is *often* based on neediness. People produce kids for the same reason they have orgasms. Biology convinces them that they really, really WANT this goal to be met, and that their happiness depends upon it. It *feels* like this is true.

The reality is quite different, though, as someone pointed out earlier. Having kids is a full-time job - if done well. Everyone involved suffers if too much is taken on in addition. This isn't very "liberated," but based on actual observation, it seems to be the case. I'm not saying that there aren't moments of reward in parenting. Gary has a son, whom we see a lot of, and they love each other dearly. But those moments of reward are, in many, many families, very few, in comparison with the other worries and stresses. Perhaps this is not true in a tribe, but it's true even in many stable marriages. And today, stable marriages are increasingly unlikely. The odds of your becoming a single parent at some point, Hotspring, are huge. Of course, they improve if you master what you're now learning...life on a more even keel.

My philosophy is that if we learn how to make our intimate relationships meet our genuine needs for trusted closeness, we will feel more free to make sound decisions about whether or not to have kids. I believe that centered intimate relationships help us make choices better, not just about kids, but about every area of our lives. We *see* things more clearly, and with less neediness.

My hope is that someday people will master relationships *first*, and THEN decide if they feel called to be parents or not. I feel we all have potential "assignments," things we could accomplish in our lives, and that we are far more likely to accomplish them if we're willing to clear our perception by every means we can, and then do some inner listening on our ideal course of action. For some, that "ideal assignment" may be to be a parent. I have a very close friend who is a wonderful mom. But she felt called to adopt a girl from Cambodia, who would have probably been starving and living in rags otherwise (judging from the photos of her former family). In other words, she reached out to help another member of our human tribe. It wasn't just her genetic program talking.

Let me quickly add that I'm not saying all parents who produce their own children are just listening to their biology. I'm merely saying, I think we should all listen within very carefully before casually slipping into the reproduction business. It may be we came back this lifetime with some larger assignment that we can't do well AND have children who are properly bonded and supported.

So if I HAD to give anyone advice (which, as you correctly point out, I generally avoid when it comes to this subject), I would say, "Master karezza. Then, when you are centered, and your relationship feels healthy and stable, do some inner listening. Try to align your will with Divine Will...just so you don't regret it later, when you get back up to your cloud Eye-wink and realize that you could have made some much needed, lasting contribution for the benefit of humanity, if you hadn't been listening only to your genes. On the other hand, if you listen within, and you get the clear impression that your highest assignment is to bear children, then GO FOR IT with all the excellence and love you can muster!"

I feel that if we all did this, things would come out just right - in the sense that those who should become parents will, and those who could contribute with greater satisfaction in some other way will do so. Meanwhile, however, a lot of people are having kids without thinking. I have another friend, who married a man with a congenital disease that caused him to go blind. She married him, for a while, and produced two children. I couldn't help asking her why she would do that, knowing they faced a risk of going blind. She said, "well that would just be their karma." But the real answer was, "because I was desperate to have kids however I could get them. I wanted them for ME, not for THEIR welfare." Now her daughter is going blind at twenty. I ask you...do you think that was Divine Will? I don't. And I think it is bound to have karmic repercussions...for the mother.

On the other hand, some kids MAY selflessly come back to help out their parents with gaining key insights, so having a child can be an important life lesson for the parents. My only point is that it can't hurt to "listen up" before conceiving.

It troubles me that the one impulse we think should be entirely up to our wills and impulses is our urge to procreate. We've even created "gods" who insist that's what we're supposed to do. But look around. If we were thinking of ourselves as a unit, rather than as individuals, we would see the single-mindedness of this instinctual response.

Second point: partner choice

I think any two people in relationship can make progress using karezza. I do not think mate choice should be random...or based on "the hots." When someone is already in a marriage, my suggestion is always "give the ideas a try first...so you see each other more clearly. THEN figure out if you're supposed to be together."

My impression has been that you felt there was a lesson to be learned with GH, and that this "assignment" was up for you now. That is why I have encouraged you to stay with it for a few months...without trying to second-guess the divine plan or worry about who will father your children. Reading the post above, it seems clear to me that you are receiving huge gifts that would benefit your children when you have them...with whomever.

Believe me, they will benefit enormously by having two parents, rather than one (there are many statistics on this). If you *have* learned a means to greater harmony, then this lesson is important preparation for parenting. The point is that you didn't even know you could learn more about harmony, or that you needed to. Only by following your inner guidance is it becoming clear to you. I have seen this kind of process over and over in my own life. The lessons we need most are the ones we can't even SEE that we need...even when they are critical for our most cherished goals.

But back to the issue. To say that any two people can benefit from karezza, is not the same as saying partners are interchangeable. I don't believe that for a moment. I think it is *very* important to check within before hooking up with ANY partner, for any purpose. As you know, Gary and I connected on this basis. He seemed a very strange choice for me in some ways, and yet, a year into our relationship, he began to dig up science that I had no idea even existed, and it has been a key part of my life's work.

Most of us choose our mates - as I did for years - based on our biological impulses, without even realizing that's what we're doing. (This is especially tricky, since biology is also behind "The Coolidge Effect." That is, biology will always keep us moving on to the next greener pasture, because it serves our genes, not our children or us.) Even if we have an "ideal mate" list, the chances are that biology plays an important part in our choice (looks, resources). Even if biology doesn't figure prominently, that list is usually purely selfish. It's what we think we need to raise our status, fund our dreams, improve our self-esteem, please our parents, etc.

How many of us put on our list, "I would like a mate with whom I could make my maximum contribution to mankind's true benefit?"

What would happen if we did that?

So, no, I don't think mate choice should be random. But I do think it's wise, unless strongly guided by a force higher than the primitive brain, to "love the one your with" until a particular lesson is learned, before bolting impulsively for the next one. In my experience, when the Plan calls for partners to move on - because it's to the benefit of both - then things move. There's no need to scrabble constantly to try to move the pieces the way we *think* we want them.

I was *very* good at moving pieces myself, by the way. Time after time, I forced outcomes, only to realize that, thanks to factors I couldn't see coming, I ended up clutching straws even after I got what I "wanted." I got tired of hitting my head against the same brick wall, and decided to shut up and listen (I know that's hard to imagine... Smiling ). So when I encouraged you to stay with GH for a bit, and stop that restless analysis of "who's going to father my baby?" it was not because I was trying to impede your parenting ambitions, but because this relationship/learning opportunity seemed to be on your path - according to what YOU were saying.

Just curious, did you ever consider that the Divine Plan is trying to give you just what you want because it IS right for you? Could GH, in fact, be the best possible father available? And that all you really need is time to clear your perception, so you can see his potential more clearly? He seems to be able to complement your lovely fireworks in a way that few men could. Plus he sounds very kind and tolerant. Do you think your kids would need two firebrands for parents?

I don't know the answer to these questions, but I honestly believe your higher self does. If you want to know my opinion, I would say that as you continue getting clearer, ASK as many questions as you can. But also be willing to ask the ones you think you don't want to hear the answers to. Ask what your highest purpose is. Ask if it's having kids. Think about the answers you get. Then do as you wish. It's always our choice in the end. But it doesn't hurt to try to listen to more than one opinion.

Galileo's picture

Why bother?

Marnia wrote, 'How many of us put on our list, "I would like a mate with whom I could make my maximum contribution to mankind's true benefit?"'

Thank you for putting this into words. I've been trying to formulate my concept of relationship, and this is definitely it. Ever since my last assignment ended, and I'm waiting to find out about the next one, I want to be clear about who I am, what I'm doing and why. It will no longer be because I'm prey or predator, addicted to nature's reward system and lulled into mediocrity by ignorance, indifference or naivite.

xo
Galileo

fleur_rare's picture

seems so selfish to me

A young woman in my family wants to have children because "the world needs good people" and seems to feel that the providing of good people to the world is what spirit is wantig from her. (she is pregnant right now)

So she just passes on the duty of "maximum contribution to mankind's true benefit" to her child!!

She is a very ...how to say... ...advanced... being, with a lot of inner knowlegde and a big heart, and spirit tries to come through throughout her. What a loss! Since she's into the b-business it seems that she's not so much trying to find out about the truth anymore. What a pity, what a loss! And her mother was thinking the same way, too.... so they pass the duty on and on and on...

Her "maximum contribution to mankind's true benefit"? Let's talk it over in 20 years from now...

And another thought: Even in times of war people are still breeding. Isn't that kind of brute and cold and cruel to the children? (for example both my grandma's had her children during war...). My mom and my dad both were born in the midst of second world war... My mom was extremly traumatised by the horrors of war she survived. She died as an alcoholic 50 years later... Never managed to be happy in her life.

Mitsiky's picture

I disagree

Being a parent, while consuming time and energy, does not disable one from accomplishing anything of wider benefit during that time.

fleur_rare's picture

...

...are you a parent?

Mitsiky's picture

No.

I do *have* parents, though. One of them earned two advanced degrees and wrote a play while raising us and teaching special ed part time.

CuriousFellow's picture

Wow

What an awesome post, Marnia!

I'm not an altruist. I don't put "mankind" first; I put myself, and my family first - although I think there is rarely, if ever, a conflict. So my question for myself is simply, "Who would I most enjoy spending the rest of my life with?"

I also like Lancer's comment about wanting to go home to "serenity."

--------------------------

Which brings me to one bit of disagreement with your post, Marnia. You said, "[Goldenheart] seems to be able to complement your lovely fireworks in a way that few men could."

Assuming that by "fireworks" you are referring to scolding, heated arguments and the like, I hereby arrogantly presume to speak for Goldenheart and every quiet, nonconfrontational person on the planet: There is NOTHING "lovely" about such "fireworks"!

Disrespectful Judgements, Selfish Demands, Angry Outbursts. Those are three of the Love Busters discussed in Harley's book (see www.marriagebuilders.com).

We guys can act quite stoically in the face of harsh criticism, scolding, etc. But it can feel like a knife in the heart.

Hotspring, Zoe, and others who may have a sharp tongue: if you care about your relationship, tone down the harsh words! Read the Love Busters book. It will show you better ways to deal with conflicts and to get what you want.

hotspring's picture

Thank you very much Marnia,

Thank you very much Marnia, I knew you would have a very lucid explanation for all of this! I'm going to print this out and pore over it some more.

Giving up orgasms is a piece of cake compared to aligning oneself with Divine Guidance. Or perhaps its not that hard at all, we simply don't have any frame of reference for what that entails. Stopping orgasms is tangible. Aligning with divine guidance is more nebulous. How would you know for sure it was divine guidance, and not just your ego appropriating its version of it, or your mammalian brain?

What giving up orgasms and aligning with divine guidance have in commong (in my experience at least) is slowing down and tuning in. When I am taking the time to nurture myself, divine guidance is more clear and obvious. This brings home the point that we must also make the time to care for our own inner world and inner listening as well. (and how people manage to do that with children is beyond me, I can barely manage in such a fast-paced society as a single woman). I feel I'm pretty much in the situation right now tipping my world over, - deep down I know this is good for me, which is why I have stuck to it, but most of the time I am disoriented as to how to navigate, since the new operating system isn't fully lubricated yet.

Thank you also, CuriosFellow, for your insight and comments. I'd like to point out though, that I am not Zoe. I realize its most natural for you to relate what is said here to the closest equivalent to your experience, but actually I'm not at all verbally abusive. I'm direct, but not melodramatic or angry.

Thanks for everyone's input, I'm still digesting everything.

WilliamC's picture

Learning to Love What Is

I have a very dear friend who subscribes to the idea that it does not matter who you partner with. What is most important is learning to love each other as is and give up the need to be in charge or to have wars over control. She's tried it in marriage four different times with varying degrees of success.

I want to try with the next Goddess I meet to not worry about the externals too much and to do the Exchanges and see if it is possible to build a relationship one step at a time.

Marnia's picture

I confess I wasn't

thinking of fireworks in a negative way. I was just thinking of your admirable feistiness, Hotspring. Smiling

CuriousFellow's picture

Just a bit concerned

Hotspring, I'm not chastising you. I'm just a bit concerned and trying to offer some friendly advice.

It's like there's a quicksand pit near where we are standing. Yesterday someone wandered by, no one warned her, she fell in, and the results were rather sad. And today someone else came by, someone warned him, he said "yeah, I know," and then he stepped into a part of the pit that he didn't know about... and the results were rather sad.

So I just want to be sure you fully understand the boundaries of that quicksand pit. I don't want you to suffer the same fate as those others.

And I know you're not Zoe. All I know about you comes from what I have read in this blog. But here are some of the things that give me concern:

On Aug 11 you wrote: "Yesterday we had perhaps the most stupid argument of my adult career." and "Being around someone so unconfrontational causes me to feel even more direct and aggressive."

And today you wrote "I expressed appreciation... for his ability not to get thrown off course by any drama I throw his way."

Do you see why I might be a little bit concerned?

In the Love Busters book, Harley says that people who engage in those love busting behaviors (selfish demands, disrespectful judgments, angry outbursts) are often quite unaware of what they are doing. Zoe is a perfect example of that. Sometimes, when I feel like she is being unreasonably harsh toward me, I'll protest about the scolding or lecturing. She always denies that she is "scolding" or "lecturing" me. "Well, what were you doing, then?" I might ask. "I was just saying that you don't help out enough around the house," she might say. Or "I was just trying to share my knowledge and experience." "All right, if it wasn't scolding, what word can I use to describe the way you were talking to me just now?" I might ask. I've never gotten a useful answer. It makes it impossible to even discuss the scolding behavior.

Harley says that if there is disagreement about whether something is or is not a disrespectful judgment, etc., then it IS. In other words, the target gets to decide if something is a disrespectful judgment, etc.

So, Hotspring, sometime when you are in a cheerful and loving mood (which I hope is often), why not ask GH if he thinks you ever speak too harshly to him? If you don't speak harshly to him, you have nothing to worry about, and there is no harm done by asking, right? Smiling And if you do, well, there is something that you can work on that can improve your relationship!

Best wishes -- CF

hotspring's picture

I appreciate your concern,

I appreciate your concern, and I see where you're coming from and where you might have gotten the impression I'm near a sandpit when it comes to my communication.

In general I'm not super melodramatic as far being accusatory or lecturing or judgemental openly about another person goes, I'm more hard on myself than anything and my drama tends to take the form of me ruminating outloud about my internal struggles, and realizing it can be indulgent to do so. Also, next to an EXTREMELY MELLOW and largely unmelodramatic, or should I phrase it as nonconfrontational or someone who might even avoid expressing emotion, pretty much anything minor can seem dramatic next to someone so unable to speak up or share what is going on inside.

I do have judgements of GH, but none more severe than my own of myself, and I do not have angry outbursts.

There's a great book on nonviolent communication by a guy named goldman I believe. If you haven't already read it, it might be helpful in finding a way to get your point across to Zoe and help her feel understood too. So, one thing you can do is active listening. When she complains or scolds about not helping around the house, empathize and mirror her feelings back to her, "It sounds like that is really frusterating for you", or "I can see now that how challenging it might be to live with me, do you have any specific suggestions?". Then rather than saying she is scolding you, which is accusatory, first make an observation (this should not take the form of a veiled judgement), then state your feelings, then your need, then make a specific request (different from a demand). Something like, "I've noticed you raise your voice when talking to me about house chores. I feel ________ in this situation. I need have mature, constructive communication in my relationships in order to feel happy in them. Would you consider toning your voice down when you find yourself agitated about this? Would you consider reading a book on nonviolent communication with me so that we can enjoy our time together at home more?" Something along those lines. If you make a request, the only rule is that you cannot cloak a demand in the form of a request. You must accept that she may or may not heed your request.

richardsnewsong's picture

Give up Orgasms?

I was once quoted as saying:

richardsnewsong wrote:
"Orgasms are like vitamins - one a day is about right. Give up orgasm? I would rather be dead!"

My experience with cancer has taught me to be very careful about what I verbalize just in case the universe is listening and takes me literally!

So many good topics in this string - where to start? I know! My beloved orgasms!

hotspring wrote:
Giving up orgasms is a piece of cake compared to aligning oneself with Divine Guidance.

This is pregnant with meaning at least for me. It is one of many "chicken and egg" metaphors in this string. Marnia is right to suggest aligning with one's partner and divine guidance before deciding about having kids. So many couples ARE having kids for so many wrong reasons. CF is so right to suggest one count the cost of raising children in a loving home as it is a huge endeavor that requires constant sacrifice that will erode even the strongest marriage if the relationship is not grounded in unconditional love.

Another key point - actually, one of many that Marnia made:

Marnia wrote:
But I do think it's wise, unless strongly guided by a force higher than the primitive brain, to "love the one your with" until a particular lesson is learned, before bolting impulsively for the next one.

I am so good at "doing my mate's recovery" and detailing all her problems and shortcomings when in fact, she is God's divine provision for helping me face my lessons in life - the problem being that I resist these lessons all the way, kicking and screaming and making a fuss much like a 2 year old in full temper tantrum. And yes, that is some hyperbole thrown in but then again, maybe not - I am sure I act at least like an 8 or 9 year old. As Marnia said, I can force my mate's hand, move the pieces and in the end, wherever I go, I take me with me!

So in the end, it does come down to divine guidance and why is it so hard to be in alignment? You are so right Hotspring, it is very nebulous and thus our ability to rely on such subtle energy can be challenging, at least for me it is.

I am struck with the realization that I did not fall to my knees first thing today, did not seek to pray and meditate to start my day. Instead, I raced to my computer to interact with my fellow human beings, not necessarily a bad thing but what is my priority here? So until I repair my relationship with divine guidance that I totally surrender to divine wisdom in what I say and do, I am resigned to miss the key life lessons that I need for my benefit.

My therapist suggested yesterday - I knew I really like this guy, but now I really like him - that I fire my God and get a new one. One that loves me unconditionally. One that always is there for me when needed. One that is not harsh and critical to condemn me. Who wants that sort of God, right? And so my work in life right now, is to see how my concepts of God were formed when I was an innocent child, shaped by my parents and other key adults that had power over my powerlessness. It was my mistake, an honest mistake at that, to imbue God with these same qualities when in fact, that is not God indeed.

So I terminated my old God, with 2 weeks notice of course to avoid violating any regulations around such things, and will be interviewing new God candidates this week. The new God must exhibit love, joy, peace, patience, gentleness, kindness, faithfulness and the discipline to get things done. I am hoping to take my time and really get to know this new God, so that connecting with God first thing in the morning and last thing every evening is something that I would never think of not doing. This new God will help me give up orgasms, or not, depending on what is in my best interests, physically, emotionally and spiritually. Life will become that easy!

I have not intended anything in my sharing to reflect on anyone else and their relationship with God, nor their relationship with partners. It is just a snapshot of where I am at and where I have been in recent times in my journey. Even when I am not blogging, I am with everyone in spirit and love to keep up with the collective experience of this wonderful, gracious community.

Great thread - love this stuff.

Richard

Marnia's picture

I was an athiest

for much of my life, and it was a defining moment when I not only realized I was in love with the Divine, but also that It was just as "goofy" about me. *kiss* That was why it was helping me to see my blocks, and then to understand fascinating things about all sorts of phenomena.

At first I found it helpful to think of the Divine as female...even though I knew it was not limited to a particular gender. That exercise helped me allow myself to feel "hugged" more easily than when I thought of It as male. Now gender no longer enters into the equation. (Hope "Flower" is listening. Eye-wink )

In any case, inner listening IS a challenge. But the real point I was trying to make is that there are things we can do to improve our reception. Meditation is one. Non-goal oriented bonding behaviors, with or without gentle intercourse, are another. These are ways to hear more clearly...or with less inner conflict. That's the right time to make important decisions. Not when feeling artificially needy thanks to fluctuating brain chemistry.

Galileo's picture

Divine contact

Contact with the Divine force happens even when we are not conscious of it, but its better when we are:

"The surest way toward integral fulfillment is to find the Master of the secret who dwells within us, open ourselves constantly to the divine Power which is also the divine Wisdom and Love and trust to it to effect the conversion. But it is difficult for the egoistic consciousness to do this at all at the beginning. And, if done at all, it is still difficult to do it perfectly and in every strand of our nature. It is difficult at first because our egoistic habits of thought, of sensation, of feeling block up the avenues by which we can arrive at the perception that is needed. It is difficult afterwards because the faith, the surrender, the courage requisite in this path are not easy to the ego-clouded soul. The divine working is not the working which the egoistic mind desires or approves; for it uses error in order to arrive at truth, suffering in order to arrive at bliss, imperfection in order to arrive at perfection. The ego cannot see where it is being led; it revolts against the leading, loses confidence, loses courage. These failings would not matter; for the divine Guide within is not offended by our revolt, not discouraged by our want of faith or repelled by our weakness; he has the entire love of the mother and the entire patience of the teacher. But by withdrawing our assent from the guidance we lose the consciousness, though not all the actuality -- not, in any case, the eventuality -- of its benefit."

--Sri Aurobindo

Marnia's picture

Thanks for this

beautiful, inspiring post.

hotspring's picture

Lovely, thank you. Perhaps

Lovely, thank you. Perhaps our divine nature is a bit TOO understanding and patient at times? Has anyone had any experiences where it spoke really loudly and clearly, undeniably to the ego? Why is it so subtle and patient?

Galileo's picture

Free Will

I've read that it has something to do with respecting our free will. -G

ragnar's picture

TOO understanding ?

Quote:
Why is it so subtle and patient?

Maybe because our divine is inherently disobedient and doesn't like to communicate with bossy Egos.
For me, ego is speaking in power-over language that endeavor to place me in a hierarchy whereas the entirety of my self floats way beyond the morality of the politicly powerful in our society (those who proclaim what is right, wrong, good and bad as a rudder for taking THEIR interests into safe harbor).

The Self that CAN feel the divine (and please let's not replace some earthly power with a fictitious, all powerful deputy that "lives in heaven") ... that Self doesn't know anything for sure because reality is always in flux but Self trusts that it will feel what it needs to be and do when it needs guidance. The thing that can throw me off, is the neurotically obtained, fear based, loud information which draws conclusions, largely irrelevant to the present moment ... when I'm not in the grip of neurotic feelings, I don't mind subtle and patient.

hotspring's picture

Yes, I agree. Tho subtle,

Yes, I agree. Tho subtle, this broader spectrum of awareness is very profound.

Nice to have you back, Ragnar! How are things on your end?

richardsnewsong's picture

Such Wonderful

words of wisdom Galileo and very much what I needed to hear upon return from my morning errands.

So yes indeed hotspring, why so subtle and such infinite patience?

Perhaps, as the saying goes, "Give a man a fish and he will eat for today - teach him how to fish and he can eat for life."

I believe that the Divine did not create us with such miraculous complexity, only to be mindless robots. We are endowed by our Creator with many gifts, including our precious free will. One of many things I adore about Galileo's post on Sra Aurobindo is the reference to "ego-clouded soul".

So there I sit on the bank of my favorite fishing spot, dangling my bait as only my ego-clouded soul knows how, and God sends a divine messenger into my life - could be my wife, my lover, my friend, my child, my boss - and the message is, "Richard, how is the fishing today - catching any?" If I am capable of swallowing my pride and admitting, "Nope, not even a bite!" then and only then might I open up to the potential for trying another type of bait.

It is said that Edison on his way to inventing the light bulb, failed over 1,000 times to find the right metal for making the filament. His ego-less response was to acknowledge that each failure showed him something that would not work - thus narrowing the potential options for finding what would.

As I watched each of my infant children learn to walk, I was reminded that if they gave up after falling the first time, they would never have learned the gift of walking. And so it goes in my life that I stumble and fall, bruise my shin, strain my achilles - try anything and everything I can think of that does not work until finally one day - Ta Da - I learn to run and race like the wind!

I also question the extent of God's patience in my life but I'm doing better, thank you.

I can't say it was loud, but I have had some incredible moments of clarity since my dance with cancer began. I remember right after my diagnosis - my marriage and family shattered in pieces all around me - I was having quite the pity party and wishing that I was dead. I was all alone and aimlessly wandering around the house, as if taking inventory of what I needed to do before I gave up and checked out, letting the cancer run it's course.

I chanced upon a thick 3 ring binder - full of the divine music I have played for most of the last 26 years and started to browse the pages. As I did, I could feel God's spirit embracing me in love and a still, quiet voice that expressed appreciation for each song that I chose and how it was shared. It was like being a little boy again and sitting on my father's lap as he shared with me a photo album of our lives and times together and I experienced a warm embrace of approval for people's lives that I had touched, mostly unbeknown to me. In that moment, I knew that there was still more music in me to share with others and the healing that comes from music shared energetically from a heart of love. I purposed to yield to continue to my divine purpose and to "always do my best" in manifesting my gifts - much as I was told in "The Four Agreements", a book by Don Miquel Ruiz.

Oregon is such a glorious place for it's trees and I am always in awe of how each tree is unique in how it is shaped and formed by the elements - the soil it grows in, the moisture available on that part our our valley, the varying sun exposure of each slope, the wind and the storms that bend it or break it and ultimately strengthen it.

I see perfection in each tree - a reflection of how it developed in response to the unique conditions in it's life and I purpose to live with this same purpose knowing that I dare not be a deciduous tree, envying the beautiful evergreen for it's thick robe of needles in winter.

Now that I think about it, I do see and hear about the divine very loud and clear in our natural surroundings and love to feel really small and insignificant in the midst of a brilliant display of lightning with the resounding thunder that follows.

And as ego surrenders in that moment of awe, divine spirit increases in my life and it overflows to those around me.

Richard

hotspring's picture

Beautiful reflections, as

Beautiful reflections, as always, Richard. We're lucky to have you in this forum.

I have also had my breath taken away at the beauty of the trees here in Oregon.

Anyone Here involved with

Anyone Here involved with Arnold Mindel's processwork organisation in Portland? (that's just a tickle- google it if you must) On the Divine front. Many years ago I was active in Subud. A spiritual organisation who's primary focus was a practice of recieving grace and guidance from our higher power on a moment by moment basis. All races and religions welcome. We recieved in voice and movement. It seemed to have a lot to do with intention - as in "Iam ready to recieve now" and surrender in terms of my willingness to enact what I recieve as I recieve it. I developed a way of being in that practice which allowed what came to me to move thru unimpeded.It always feels like a cloak of privacy. As in , I am(volentarily) under divine tuition,and it is not my business or yours to judge or censor. You may notice my recieving with awe for the fact that it's happening. But it's not my business or yours to understand it with the mind and intellect. It was easiest to first become familiar with the feel of this by simply choosing to witness someone else in their act of recieving. The strange thing is that, for me, I never know wether I am being guided until I most surely am. I wait and watch making tenative gestures until the wave lifts my feet somehow free. Now days in drumming a songline will appear. or perhaps in dance an ego ghost will strut a nessesary statement thereby releasing me from the need to carry that thru my daily round. And ... OH thank you! sometimes an angel takes me over and I move with grace. But mostly I'm just an ordinary Bloke.

Mindel talks about secondary process. A synergistic dramtime noticing of symptomatic coincidence that can open doors to increased consiousness. -You can follow the thread of a body symptom say an itch or ,to put this in context , an erection, as you allow your awareness of it to expand ,it may tell you it's story. The same thing works with coincedental symbols that crop up in your world . Let's say that great penis shaped rock that you noticed a moment ago as you drove past Eye-wink Thus God speaks to man. I remember during puberty noticing knotholes in fence boards and wondering what it would feel like...

I've got two wonderful kids.

I've got two wonderful kids. Their presence has utterly reshaped every aspect of my life. I don't know which would have a bigger impact , a child, or an abortion. I'm inclined to think that conception lives! I'ts nice to be aware about avoiding it if you don't feel up to a huge dose of divine intervention just at the moment. Seems that we do like to have our reality by the short and curlies. I'd say that even extends to a tendency to use kids in an attempt to propagate our own take on things. For example the notion that the world needs more good people. I wonder if God is on her side?

I like you guys and

I like you guys and appreciate the willingness to listen while others bleat blog and bloat. Eye-wink Thanks

Further post chocolate

Further post chocolate reveries. I had a period of considering wether I might in fact be a multiple personality some years ago. The separation between these various selves got me noticing the separation between me in my relationship to god . . . I also noticed that the enactment of various ego based roles seemed to shift and change as I moved thru my life (especially with the advent of children Eye-wink ). So, what exactly was me?? Thru the practice of recieving gods grace ,as we all do, a thread of comonality was appearing in the nature of my dances, meanderings, and special moments. Something intangible that kept croping up. It didn't seem to matter if I climbed way out on a limb of the great ego tree. On some fruity branch. Dangling. By some bad joke . Posing. As The Almighty Orgasm. Sure enough when I let go there has usually been something familiar about how I do what comes next. Especially if I'm on recieve! . . . ok i'll stop now

hotspring's picture

Yes, thanks for your musings

Yes, thanks for your musings omulu, they are ripe and flowing. Awareness of many planes, willingness to play and explore . . . always welcome here!

Marnia's picture

Your musings are welcome,

but you may want to collect them in a blog of your own, if that would be more convenient for you. Here are the instructions:

How do I create my first blog entry?

Starting from the menu on the left, you can do either of the following:

* follow the links: 'my account' > 'view recent blog entries' > 'Post new blog entry.'
* follow the links: 'create content' > 'blog entry'.

Write and submit just as you would for a forum post.

You will find the list of your own blog entries in reverse chronological order at: 'my account' > 'view recent blog entries'.

Anyone else who wants to blog, can just send me a message (click on my name).

Seems that I already have a

Seems that I already have a first blog entry . Thanks. I've never bloged before. I am reminded of the saying . Opinions are like a--holes, everyones got one. Have I been airing mine without the curteousy of giving you all enough infobits to get a handle on who I might be? It takes a bit of communication to become conversant with someone that you haven't got a fix on yet. We make our offerings so that the other may create what we'd like to think of as an appropriate story about who we are. There might be something about context as well, in my choosing to engage in conversations without providing much of an inentikit. I guess what I'm wondering is just exactly who this proposed convenience would be for? And would it be preferable to you, if I took my opinions back to my own private box instead of flaunting them quite so publicly? PS I note certain prickly sensations that may have something to do with day 7. That said I'm not sure I like the inadvertant rating based on how many days since my last orgasm. It seems that shifting my ego identification into being a person who chooses not to experience orgasm is an intensely engaging process,on many levels. I have trouble with the linear progression so common in the lingo of addiction\ recovery. Identifying and updating the, how tall is my pedistal , thing doesn't appeal. I intend to swim around in the muck until I get the feel of things. Yet another elusive potential dreambody on the move. and we're only scratching the surface of the pool....

PS I don't understand from

PS I don't understand from your coment wether I might be able to gather up the musings I've written so far and plonk them in in my blog compartment. Just a bit ignorant on the workings of websites. thanks

Marnia's picture

No, you can't move

the bits you've already written, except by copying them into new entries.

Also, you may certainly just continue to comment here and there. Some people prefer that. Some do both. They blog when they have something to say that's not a direct response to another's words, and reply when they want to converse.

Do exactly as you please. I just wanted to remind you of your options, since some of your remarks seemed more in the nature of general musings.

Thanks for the patient

Thanks for the patient response. I seem to have been all balls and sharp teeth today. Eye-wink I'll try relaxing on the exhale .