Healing the gap at Reuniting
I have a question for the men here who are struggling with porn addiction. It seems quite clear to me that there is an extreme shortage of women participating on this forum, as well as women signing up to be Courtly Companions. I've heard that many women may not feel comfortable talking with a man they do not know about this kind of problem, privately or publicly on the forum.
For me personally, I'm just an introvert. I've written a little about myself here, I post a comment once in awhile, and I have the same "companion" that I've had for the last year, as we've become very good friends. I don't feel squeamish about porn addiction, because I've seen it firsthand with my ex, and with the friends I've made here, but I also really have no idea what to say to most of the men who arrive here suffering. I read your stories, and they all affect me, but I just don't know what I can do.
So, I guess what I want to ask you is: What can I, or other women who may feel the same as me, do to support you? Some of us simply cannot do the "courtly companion" thing, due to time restrictions or uneasiness, but we may be able to offer other forms of support. How do you feel about having women here while you discuss your struggles? Does it help you, or motivate you? Maybe terrify you?
I really wanna know these things. If I listen carefully, I think I can already hear what Marnia has to say about it, and you know I love you, Woman, but I really want to hear from the men about this.
Anyone care to share their thoughts?
- Discordia's blog
- Log in or register to post comments



Comments
My opinion:
I think, in general, pleasure-driven sexuality puts a barrier between men and women. Women really do become objectified as pleasure-objects, we see women the way an addict would look at a woman if she had money or drugs in her pants. The after-orgasm hormones also seem to increase hostility and distrust between the sexes, and add to that the guilt for past actions (or present intentions).
If this was a male-only forum, the barrier would still be intact, and there would be a lack of (authenticity?) in a closed circle of men talking about relating to women properly. I think having Marnia head the site as well as having input from female posters is a large part of the "good note" that the site hits for me. It's very fitting that the "cure" is being offered from the other side of the divide.
I would say that there's not much you have to do, just naturally contribute, when you see an opening, when you have something to offer. I think that your presence would be the main good, and whatever insight you have to offer would be the icing on the cake.
I agree,
and I think that if the site was being run by a man, there would probably be even less women present. I do really feel that it is important to have women here, not just for the porn addicts, but to talk about sacred sexuality! I ran out of things to talk about in that regard a long time ago, seeing as how I have so little experience.
I sometimes will sit on my computer reading all the posts for a good long time, think of things to say, and yet talk myself out of it. Maybe it's shyness, or fear that I will be misunderstood or exposed in someway. I don't really know, but I would really like to work on that part of myself, and to help the men here at the same time, if possible. I think there is also simply a need for friendship and self-expression among the people here. Many of us have probably spent a lot of time alone, due to our addictions or reclusive nature. So, maybe I shouldn't worry so much that what I feel like talking about might not have anything to do with sex or porn. Simple interactions are healing in themselves, right?
I guess I'm just kinda thinking out loud here. The truth is, I also have a lot more healing work to do, and I know in my heart that this is the place for me to talk about it. It is really the only place where I know for certain my feelings about sex and healing will not be put down. I am grateful for that.
The point is: I plan to make more of an effort to contribute, for your well being and for my own. And I'm really glad I posted this, because believe it or not, I actually had women email me who felt as I do. I had a feeling that was the case, now I know for sure. They are here, they are just being sneaky, kinda like ninjas.
It's
always nice to have your posts here.
And a big wave to the silent ninjas! Ninjettes? Ninjitas?
Hi Discordia
From my point of view addiction is a universal and shared problem for the whole human race. Whatever expression that we have chosen is just one
flavor of many. You can abuse almost everything like food, sugar, sports, books, movies, social events, computer games and so on.
The addiction we have chosen is about what was the best protection that we could find at the moment. For me it was porn and masturbation that gave me the comfort that i searched. Worked very well, but to a price. Porn is categorized as fantasy sex, an extension of fantasies, a tool to alter feelings. To make me feel better, short term. The same goes for all the other expressions of addiction. I think most people can recognize some minor or major addictive behaviors. If you also put it into the context of Dopamine rush and so on then it becomes clear that this is truly a universal problem.
In SLAA there is many that have addiction to romance, the fantasies of the romantic and perfect relation. In real life they can never hold on to a partner (partly because of the Dopamine, perhaps ) and they get stuck in theses fantasies instead of the image driven fantasies that porn addicts use. Naturally there is combination of many addictions as well. It seems like this Love/romance addiction is more compelling to woman, by the numbers of woman in the meetings. In the background however, sex, porn and Love addicts have is the same problem: The lack of contact with themselves. I guess the same goes for all the other addictions as well....
For me it is great to hear from anyone that is developing one's spirit and well being, no matter what background they have. I is also very helpful just to know that i am not alone in this, i am not a monster. That people like yourself, without the addiction, cares.
Sorry for a long and perhaps out of the point post :?
Thanks
/ Soulsearching
Thank you so much for your comments
I am very sincere when I say that I see no monster in you, or in anyone else here. In fact, reading the comments of men here, many of which are wounded and vulnerable, has given a much greater understanding of the delicacy and sensitivity of men than most any other experience would. We are taught that men are supposed to be a certain way, big and tough, and honestly, that lie gets tiresome for me. I prefer reality, and I get a good dose of it here almost daily.
In addition, the men here are mostly kind, gentle, and gracious. Seriously, some of you guys have made me question the character of some of my male friends. I ask myself: why am I hanging out with these jerks when there are so many nice guys on the forum?!? I know the whole "prince inside every frog" theory, but some of the frog princes in my life have really been pissing me off lately! So, really, you guys are raising my personal standards by just being yourselves.
I'm curious about SLAA: are there any women in those groups, or are they led and attended by men only?
SLAA
Thanks for your kind words. Makes me proud of being a man actually
.
SLAA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SLAA) has a lot of meetings all around the world. The meetings i have attended are for both women and men who feel that they are suffering from compulsive sexual or romantic behavior. It is based on the 12 step foundation that originates from AA. All meetings are self controlled and therefore all meetings are slightly different. There is open and closed meetings, meetings with only women and meetings with only men. Most meetings are mixed and most are closed (for addicts only). The base are spiritual and aims to restore or create a spiritual view on life instead of the addictive view on life. Meetings are chaired by the addict that wants to chair the meeting for today, there is no hierarchy of the members.
I would say that women are representing about 30-40 percent in the meetings. I appreciate their presence enormously and have now friends from both sexes in the SLAA community. It is very liberating to understand how alike we are despite the differences on the outside
. The meetings gives a safe surrounding that is needed to be able to share from the hart.
Take care
/ Soulsearching
SLAA
A few days ago I went to the slaaonline.org chatroom. There were women there, and I found it a very supportive environment. People would talk about what they're going through and get support. (Advice is discouraged, so it's just positive support.) I plan to go back. Community and connection with others is very important, and this is a big part of why the 12-step approach helps so many people. You get more than just connection with others, you get connection with others who understand what you're going through.
Thank you, Soulsearching
for enlightening me about the SLAA meetings. It sounds like the environment is very safe for both men and women. I am always so impressed by the folks here who reach out in their own communities to join with others who are suffering from this painful affliction. Good for you. It is very nice to have you here, and thanks for your comments on my blog!
Women Here
I also think having women here really helps a lot. Even though I'm not a porn addict, I am a product of modern society, which, unfortunately, sometimes messes up a man's view of women. Women are often objectified in the media. Other boys in school objectify them and make getting in their pants the most worthwhile goal, while getting to know them is for sissies. I was not immune to this influence.
Then, on the other hand, I somehow got the idea that women were unapproachable goddesses, that all of them were perfect feminists who had no lust, only love, etc.
When everyone, males and females together, talks openly about sex, it helps to break both of these attitudes because I realize that women are human beings dealing with similar issues I am.
As for what women can do to help porn addicts, my input would be to just show your true human self. Inner beauty is far more alluring than the outer form, but they (we) might have trouble seeing it from being brainwashed by the repeated message that a woman is only as good as her physical body's attractiveness.
Also, what helps is just to receive encouragement from others, to feel part of a group. For men, encouragement from other men is fine and all, but we sit up and take notice when a woman says, "Good job!" or "Keep going!" or, after a relapse, "I'm sorry." It may be a patriarchal society, but women still have amazing power. If a woman walks into a room full of 100 men, all heads turn, and she has 100% attention. Now, imagine what happens when a man walks into a room full of 100 women.
.gif" alt="smiley"/>.
Finally, I think the women here could have a lot to gain from the interaction as well. The fear is probably that the men will be... well, like men... or what passes for normal man-ness in today's society. Since most men here don't fit that stereotype, it can restore trust, and if one of us turns dehumanizing, that might still be a good thing because the woman can work on how to react from a place of empowerment. Not bitchy, for that's still weakness, but with true feminine strength. What that is, is another topic, and one I'm no expert on, but from what I've learned from David Deida about masculinity and femininity, one way to react would be to show the pain it causes, not by direct anger, but with pain. Righteous anger just makes a person defensive (especially when it's a woman yelling at a man), but pain (if not manipulative) re-humanizes her, tugs on his conscience. Easier said than done, and probably much harder online than in real life, but I still thought it worth sharing. Again, I don't know much about this stuff yet, but regardless, my thought was that this forum might be a good way for women to get experience dealing with what they fear in men and work toward healing those wounds.
I agree
I'm lucky enough to be in a class this semester in which I am one of only two female students, and the other female is considering dropping the class! This really doesn't bother me at all.
I think I will actually feel much more comfortable speaking my mind in the all male group, for some reason.
I also recently left another forum I was participating in for a little while, where I was actually the only female. It was kinda funny, but then it got a little old. It was a forum where we talked about nerdy stuff, like comic books and sci-fi films. For all the guys here who think they don't know anything about talking to women, go hang out with a bunch of 40-50 year old nerds. You'll realize that you know more than you think.
I don't they think they knew what to do with me!
As far as allowing women here to stand up for themselves to the very rare misogynists, as a form of therapy, I think that could be very powerful. However, there is also the problem that the women who are still standing on the sidelines, not sure if they should join in the conversations, may be put off just enough to decide never to join in the conversation and go elsewhere (if nobody speaks up when derogatory comments are made). I think it is an unspoken rule around here that derogatory comments about men or women are unacceptable, aside from the occasional harmless joke, such as the “perfect woman” or the “perfect man.” Still, I think at some point this “unspoken rule” may need to become a “spoken rule” as the forum expands, especially after the new book.
I suppose we can cross that bridge when we come to it, eh?
Hmmm...
not sure what to do. We now have an extra moderator, so if someone gets ugly, there are two of us, in somewhat different time zones to handle it. But it seems to me that the group here seems to handle things well without any official help.
I think there's a lot of value in not "walking around on egg shells" all the time. I like people to be able to speak their minds. As I said to one person privately..."it's like doing a jigsaw puzzle. If we want to get to the bottom of things, or at least deepen our understanding, we have to put our pieces on the table and move 'em around." That means sticking up for what we believe, but staying open to new pieces that fit with ours.
I'm open to suggestions if someone thinks something is needed.
Great Discussion - and
Great Discussion - and Discordia, its so nice to have you active in the forum again.
I myself just had a nice four day break from all internet while attending a craniosacral therapy training course (more on that to come - there is A LOT of crossover between the teachings there and what Marnia is proposing on this site).
My experience of being one of only a very few women posting on this site for more than a year has overall been very rewarding, if not at times difficult. I came to the site wanting to learn more about sacred sex that actual couples were experiencing. Instead, I learned: just how huge this problem of porn is (it was not really on the radar before). I don't think I would have been able to be as compassionate with the men in my life who are addicted to porn if it had not been for gaining some real insight here. Also, as Soulsearching said (I think it was him): "Addiction is a universal and shared problem for the whole human race." I have seen paralells between myself and porn addicts in regards to addictive tendencies in general. I have been able to see that liberation from any sort of enslavement is a shared problem for the whole human race; our very survival may depend on overcoming it, especially since we are living in a time of great wealth as far as access to consumption of addictive substances or behaviors goes, and since this excessive consumption comes at the cost of depleting precious resources elsewhere on the planet or in our lives.
I can also say that while I have often felt drained, saddened, and overwhelmed at how the issue of porn dominates this site (and therefore our culture), I do realize that again - porn is a problem that affects women very much, it affects modes of behavior between men and women and it affects how women feel they need to be to be attractive to men. So, I have a responsibility as a woman to enter into a dialogue on this topic, and to represent women who are not willling to have porn become the only reference point for how we define and express ourselves as women. I also see that this porn addiction is really a distorted expression of a very healthy desire in men to know the divine feminine. Unfortunately, porn focuses on the elements of femininity most accessable to male understanding and appreciation (the physical), and so the real juice that women have to offer gets ignored or buried.
I don't agree that a typically agressive or insensitive man in the forum would be the ideal opportunity for a woman to speak up and assert herself. On the contrary, I think that it is the obvious intelligence and sensitivity of many of you men here who are also porn addicts that is more challenging to us, because it is much harder to put you in a box. A typically agressive or mysogynistic male isn't rewarding or liberating to stand up to, because the premise of his power is a hoax in the first place; I think that the liberation comes from any dialogue between men and women that expands rather than contracts an awareness of the possibilities of what it means to grow as an individual man or woman and as men and women together. So far as there is a willingness to grow and a true belief in positive potential in human beings, I'm game for a discussion, even if it does feel sad to see reality at times. Because we really must come together as men and women for this world to function at all, and we can't do that if we're not talking.
I would like to add that women already spend so much time caring for and supporting men, with little aknowledgement or reciprocity. If you men want more women to join in this discussion and support you, you will need to reach out and begin to relate to women in a way that is broader than porn as a frame of reference. After all, that's not our frame of reference (for most of us). We've been willing to listen to and read your cries of help, and bring our hearts and minds into your world. Now, as so many of you become empowered, I'd encourage you to step outside of your world and find a new reference point: one that is based on nurturing real women, and not as a means to over come addiction or feel better - rather, as a human gesture of goodwill.
Here's what you can do in support of us women that would make me very happy:
- Speak openly and frankly with as many men as you know about what you've discovered to be the dangers of porn addiction and actively encourage men you know who use porn to stop using it.
- Admit that your desire to revere the female form is a healthy impulse and be creative in finding ways to do that
- If you feel any remorse for having contributed to unhealthy male-female dynamics through porn use, apologize to a real woman face to face and consider yourself representing and speaking for all men to all women when you say it. Ask the woman to witness and accept your apology. I don't say this just because women need to hear it, but because it may feel clearing for you to say it.
- the greatest gift would be for you to realize your true potential and power as men and redefine in each moment how easy it is to embody positive masculinity through use of your innate support, strength, focus, intelligence, discernment - and above all, human consideration.
It's replies like yours hotspring
which make it a pleasure to be a part of this blog. I does seem that we who have or have had a problem with porn have tended to dominate this blog, certainly since I've been here (just over 2 weeks). And, in a way, I have felt a little responsible for delving too deeply into the problem when I also have had the feeling that other members would rather talk about what I believe the site was originally set up to promote ...more advanced and sacred sex. I would actually like to talk more about women and I would like to learn more about women instead of just counting the days since I last jerked-off. And after reading your reply I've decided to stick my neck out and do just that because even though I've had the privilege of having some women in my life, I know that I have just used and discarded them. That's another reason why I'm alone now and have a myriad of problems. Some things which I find difficult to fully understand about women:
After my porn usage I get the impression that there are literally millions of women engaged in selling their bodies w/o considering the consequences they are contributing to. Many of these females are intelligent enough to know that they are creating an image of the finer gender which is only sexually appealing.
Many women say they want a sensitive man but I get the impression that money and power seems to be an aphrodisiac for women. This would give insensitive men an advantage over sensitive men as insensitive men would find it easier to make big money in more unscrupulous ways i.e. pushing drugs, promoting prostitution or porn etc.
I can only speak for myself but I find it difficult to be my sensitive self because I really believe that that is not what turns women on so to speak. I know that if I am to stay away from porn, then I need a woman. I can no longer pretend to be something I'm not.
Another thing which I should mention is that one thing I have learned about myself is that I sometimes get the impression that I tend to be too direct in my approach to some things and am unconsciously insensitive to other peoples feelings so if I have said or say something which touches on your feelings in the wrong way then please forgive me I didn’t mean to. (I wish I had a prerecording of this statement so that it would play automatically every time I open my BIG mouth,) :?
jerry
Maybe...
Maybe you believe that women don't go for sensitive men because you got the belief from watching too much porn! The truth is, different women are attracted to different things, but I know *many* kind, sensitive men with girlfriends.
Actually I think a lot of you might feel discouraged from dating because of the weird beliefs you accidentally absorbed through porn use, just like women are discouraged by all the fake perfect bodies they see in advertising.
I agree with Hotspring. If you want to help heal the rift, then go out with the goal of brightening the days of women you meet, and making them feel respected and special, even in tiny little ways. You might not get a lot of outward response, but it's very likely that the person will remember your kindness for a long time afterward. I can still remember times years ago when someone gave me his seat on the subway, or helped me with a bag, or smiled and called me "ma'am."
Yes
you are of course right and I hope that you don't think that I'm criticizing women in any way. It's just that, in my eyes, many women seem to be more attracted to money and power than sensitive men. But turning it around, maybe men with money and power are more attractive because they feel good about themselves and their achievements due to society's portrayal of rich and powerful men as 'successful' without asking questions like 'how did he make his money'. Please remember that I'm sticking my neck out here and I'm not trying to provoke anyone. I know that not all women fall into this category and that most women would like a man to be 'successful' and sensitive. It's just that I think that many sensitive, normal men who are not rich and powerful get the impression that women are more attracted to the archetype, media portrayed, successful man. This subject is touchy and it gives the impression that I am labeling most women as money grabbers, but I assure you this is not the case. I just took the chance of opening a door on, what I believe (but I may be wrong) many men think. Regarding your suggestion of doing small things like opening doors or giving up seats etc, I do that often and I always get a lovely smile back from the lady. The porn was a substitute for sex and a anesthetic against the pain of my reality and in no way a surrogate woman.
Always nice to hear form you
I accept your challenge and will apologize (again) to my wife today.
To you, dear hotspring, and to all of our sisters, with tears stinging my eyes (I am such a drama queen) I deeply regret the hurt I have brought about by my actions and thoughts. I have used you for my pleasure without regard for your person. The craving and dissonance I have manifest has harmed us all and I am sorry. Today I will move my just-in-case-this-doesn't-work stash of porn to the trash.
John Upledger's classes in CranioSacral Therapy started me on my latest spiritual journey. After SER I January '07 I took a look at my steadfast atheism and somehow lost my interest in porn.
Many blessings on you and your wonderful mind and your thought provoking words
One Man Speaks
Discordia,
I agree with hotspring - it is good to see you sharing again here on the site. And as for hotspring, as always, you have said so much, I shall enjoy reading your post again and again until I grasp the profound depth of all that you have shared.
Short answer - a man's porn addiction is none of your business and no reply is necessary. I share hotspring's vision for changing the focus of Reuniting back to sacred sex, as dealing with sex addiction is draining and destructive.
Each man with addiction, at some point in time in his life, has to MAN UP and stop being a pussy boy, hiding in the secret place with his computer and clutching his dick with a deep, desperate need to feel like a man. It does not work and that is why it is so addictive.
One porn orgasm is too many, one million are not enough.
The disconnect is a generation of men that are totally out of touch with divine feminine and so, we connect with the the equally sick women of porn to do our destructive dance. I WAS one of those men and I now purpose to never manifest this ever again, God help me!
I am not trying to throw men under the bus here, just because I just jumped off at the last minute. A lot of my sickness here was manifest by interactions here that do not demonstrate rigorous honesty - some of it was intentional, some of it was unconscious. In those moments, I was reverted back to my "little boy" state and I reached out to the women of Reuniting pleading, "love me mommy, please love me."
No self respecting goddess should heed such a plea. You are right hotspring, it is draining, depleting unless you are really advanced in your consciousness and able to give out. Marnia is one example - thank God that she was able to find balance in Gary.
Had I succeeded in connecting with a loving goddess here to help me heal, I would have destroyed her. Mind you, that is not my intention. It never was. I was that sick in my addiction - it is cunning baffling and powerful.
This is my amend - I cannot speak for any other man on this site - they will have to search themselves and speak their truth.
I have been free from porn for some time. I have taken steps to release myself from the karmic connections of women in my life. I speak daily with my divine feminine and focus daily on that deep love connection that is part of learning to love myself. I am actively seeking out other healthy men that are addiction free and I am learning to bond and join the tribe where I belong.
It took me 2 1/2 years in "recovery" to see that I was not being honest with myself in my approach to recovery. Blogging on a web site, any web site, about my porn addiction can be futile if that is my only resource, as it can be so easy to avoid rigorous honesty.
We all do our best to encourage each other and I embrace the community energy we have here but....it is only a start to reveal the tip of the iceberg.
I was out in the desert all alone this week for a reason......And for that reason, my dear goddess Discordia, everything has changed.
You are doing a great job of blooming into the incredible goddess that you are. That is your karma in life and it is up to each of us as men to treat you with respect, roll up our sleeves and cleanse this insidious disease.
It can be done - my journey of claiming my manhood cannot come from a goddess - it must come from another man who is already fully man.
Richard
Jesus speaks of a cup
Jesus speaks of a cup in which you drink and never again will thirst.
That cup is being offered here, at reuniting, everyday. inscribed on its brim is a song, beckoning all men and women to self-empowerment, to embrace their divinity, seek ultimate harmony, and live a life that is full and free.
richard said it quite poetically,
Men. Drink the cup. Women. Drink the cup.
then you die to yourself.
its not a jim jones thing. honest.
lose your life to find it.
give up the empty search for instant gratification, and love on real people. begin to love yourselves!
or continue to drink the cup of dirt being offered through pornography. Its gritty and unsatisfying. demeaning and corrosive.
but something tells me that if you're here, you've already discovered that. so own it.
EDIT: I am encouraged by those who share exciting discoveries on their journeys. While I too would love to see more focus on sacred sexuality, I think the victories of overcoming addiction, and the excitement of those who truly get it are reason enough to encourage those people to continue to blog here. This place has been so important to me on my own healing journey, and its exciting to hear of others, too.
---hayduke
the light of my eyes is a pearl,
equally emptied to equally shine;
and all or what little joy in the world
seemed suddenly simple, and endlessly mine.
(mewithoutyou)
Cowboy Poetry
I kinda liked that phrase myself and hope we didn't lose half the lady population with such coarse (yet true) vulgarity. I was not suggesting in any way that men stop sharing their journey of recovery here. I was suggesting to Discordia what I believe is her highest and best approach in responding to the men she encounters here, including me!
If you think about it, and I will spare everyone some more graphic details, sexual addiction is some really yucky stuff and so powerful in the destruction it causes to the divine feminine that is manifested in the goddesses that hang out here. Oh by the way - HELLO MEN - it is very destructive to our divine masculine also and diverts us, sometimes endlessly away from our true path. If I clean up my own side of the road, the rest flows perfectly, effortlessly.
I believe that I can claim as much male blogging here as anyone over the last year so I embrace this community fully. Finally, at last, what I hope I can manifest is something of more spiritual substance beyond how many days it has been since the last time I could not keep my hand off my crotch or what monkey business I cooked up to work my way between the legs of some beautiful angel.
I began a recovery journal last week for the first time. It is powerful writing tool that is intended for me only and is shared with one other person in life, my sponsor, and of course, everything I write is, by definition, shared with the divine. Where I get tripped up in my recovery is when my writing here is searching for approval, not healing, and the first clue is when I return here again and again, looking for how many responses I get, especially if I can connect with a goddess!
I don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater. It occurs to me that if I keep this gory part of my private business to myself and focus on the spiritual lessons learned along the way, it will be better for women and men here alike. And the ladies with their silence, by not responding, can respectfully help us to clean up our mess and avoid awkward responses that draw them into our karmic mirror.
Fortunately for everyone here at Reuniting, I don't make the rules here - Marnia does - and what a blessing that is, along with the blogging anarchy that keeps me coming back for more whenever I can. Ultimately, everyone here can and does respond to the best of our ability and we are all better for the experience!
I do hope to keep writing of my experience, strength and hope with whatever clear intent I can muster. Otherwise, all are invited to take what you need and leave the rest.
Richard
I am very pleased
with the thoughtful responses this post has received. After reading hotspring's response, I thought further about whether or not women are given an opportunity for empowerment when they have to stand up to men here, or elsewhere, that may being acting aggressive. I agree with hotspring, it does not help. I've had to assert myself with several men I've come across on the internet especially, on MySpace or other forums, and it really sucks each and every time. It doesn't give me any kind of pleasure or catharsis. Fortunately, the Reuniting crowd doesn't attract too many people like that, and when it does happen, it's a little bit easier for us to chalk it up to some kind of neurochemical imbalance, and not take it too personally.
I, for one, would not displace the recovering porn addicts that have joined this community for anything. I think we are all blessed to have you here, and like I said previously, each of you has affected me with the sharing of your struggles, even when I was keeping quiet for so long. I do think it is important for everyone to realize, though, that the porn addicts on this site are not the only ones who are struggling, nor are they the only ones who have pain. We all are coming from different backgrounds, and each has his or her own obstacles to overcome. It is so easy for people to fall into the trap of believing that they are the only one who hurts, that they are so much more fucked up than the rest, but that simply is not the case. Remembering that is part of how we can show respect to others here.
I am grateful to all of you for making this site what it is.
Mari
A long ramble...
I have this feeling that somehow we're all rounding another corner together on the track. It's really uplifting and I'm grateful to you all.
I don't know if any of you have been to a Quaker meeting, but the theory is that if a group gathers together with the goal of "listening," then Spirit speaks through whoever feels called upon. It IS a kind of "anarchy," but at a deeper level it isn't. This forum often feels like that. What needs to get said, *does* get said...by someone...in its own time.
I had no clear idea why you porn folk needed to be here, but it became clear to most of us that you did. Looking back, the gifts you have brought are too many to be counted. You've helped us see others with more compassion. You've helped us realize that if oneness is part of The Goal, then no one should be left locked outside, looking in the windows, regardless of past choices. I also think you've helped me write a chapter for the new book that will be really supportive for anyone who got caught on the "Road to Excess" (its title).
You've also helped us see ourselves in you. I certainly could see the parallels between my past relationship chaos and porn addiction. (As I've said before, the common problem was "keeping our foot down on the orgasm accelerator too hard." Even though I wasn't using porn to do it.) You've helped Hotspring stop painting her face. And Discordia, who faced one of the biggest challenges here, is turning into an an unstoppable powerhouse. Maybe we could have done these things without you...but I don't know how.
G8, you're right in your observations about many women. The flip side of men entranced by fertile young bodies, is women entranced by resources and status. These programs serve our genes - very well - because they're all about offspring and offspring "fitness." It is therefore very easy for both genders to head for this default programming...especially under the stress of feeling unsupported or lonely. And I daresay few women in porn movies (or otherwise digging for gold) feel well supported by caring, dependable men. They may not even know such creatures exist.
What protects best against falling into our default programming? Actually, I don't think it's "sucking up and being manly," although that's very brave of you, and I admire the courage all of you have shown...especially *after* relapses, when it takes even more strength to start rowing again.
As you all know by now, I think the exchange of non-goal-oriented affection, or even stillness, with and without intercourse, is some of the most powerful medicine we have. That requires a partner.
The next best option is the unconditional exchanges of support we often see here. And to think...we don't even know, see or physically touch each other...yet, at least.
*Knowing* the opposite sex really, really wants you well and happy is powerful medicine, even when it's dispensed in cyber space.
In this regard, I have had some amazing men in my life. Some were sweethearts, but some were male mentors with crystal clear boundaries, who did what they could to encourage me and help me shine. Two bosses, a great uncle, and one professor particularly come to mind. (There have been some equally wonderful women in my life. My maternal grandmother, for example, supported the family AND loved to cook, and always adored my grandfather even though he morphed into a simple gardener after he lost his third job during the depression. Personally, I think she was taking a bit too much starch out of him between the sheets.
Even so, their relationship was a lot more balanced than it looked on the surface. She relied a lot on his steady, kindly presence and integrity.)
Without this kind of support from the opposite sex, it's easy for all of us to lose sight of what we can really do best for each other, and conclude that we'd better head for, or hoard, our material plane thrills or wealth. Or assume that these thrills/gifts are the way to lure a mate to use for our *own* purposes...further decaying the potential trust between the sexes.
This departure from the knowledge of what the sexes really have to offer each other is happening more and more, as each generation drifts further from those bonding behaviors, and women have less and less time for nurturing the men/kids in their lives. I think the hot pursuit of sexual gratification...which seemed like such a great idea...to ALL of us high libido folk...is speeding up this process. It actually shifts our vision of each other, *because* it leaves us feeling drained. When you're low on dopamine (feeling depleted), the opposite sex inevitably looks threatening and greedy. Nasty trick, eh?
Today a man at Ecstatic Dance (yes, I do actually have a life *chuckle*) thanked me for my newsletters and said that this other approach to sex hits people right where two great problems lie: sexual addiction and fear of intimacy. And that is why it takes time to transition. I agreed, of course.
Afterward, I was thinking about what he said, and I realized that those two problems are *closely* connected, and either one contributes to the other. You guys are seeing that sex addiction can make you a bit scary, which makes us fearful of greater intimacy. And Hotspring has done a great job of telling you what we need to take our fences down in a healthy way.
But we women owe YOU guys an apology, too. Our fear of reaching out in those same small ways (respect, smiles, admiration, graciousness, and, in our case, especially soothing nurturing) helps perpetuate sexual addiction. As Gary says, "our reward circuitry is there to urge us to seek comfort, and when it doesn't find what it is designed to find: satisfying relationships...it finds a substitute that offers short-term comfort, whatever the long-term costs - in terms of greater isolation, addiction, etc." As some of you have heard me say, he has often said he wouldn't have found the strength to give up masturbation without a sweetheart. Now, maybe *something* else would have motivated him to try abstaining more, but his words show how most of us think, I suspect.
I'm not trying to take anyone's responsibility for his own choices and actions away. I know addicts (and all of us) need to make those choices and take responsibility. I'm just suggesting that when we women stop chasing orgasms and breeding resources and genes (G
, we ALSO have more presence and courage, and can more easily make these important gifts to the men who cross our paths. (Courtly Companion anyone?
)
These "little" gifts can make a subtle, but mighty, difference in mens' lives. I think that above all, this forum has been an experiment in what these little gifts can do. And I have been amazed at some of the inspiring, tear-jerking growth that we've had the pleasure of sharing in. It's like watching flowers bloom.
I sometimes think about the roles of yin and yang. And how hard Spirit had to bash me over the head to find my "yin" qualities again, and use them. It somehow knew this rediscovery was vital to my future happiness. I remember what a shock it was when I felt like I "got it," that an ideal role for me was to make myself into a "safe harbor" for the men in my life. Me? I was so good at plowing through brick walls against all odds. Why should I try to learn such an unfamiliar skill? Didn't the Divine have any walls It needed razed???
But every bit of progress in the direction of learning to be more nurturing (while also asking the men in my life to experiment with using their sexual energy more generously and less instinctively) led to unexpected progress toward a long-cherished goal.
That goal was simply to be a healing force on the planet, however small. I was thinking in terms of learning "Therapeutic Touch," or something more obvious like that. I was NOT thinking in terms of a "safe harbor" on a website about the neurochemistry of mating and bonding.
And yet...somehow just creating this forum space (thanks, Janitor!), with that wish ("let this be a safe harbor") has led to some astonishing things. And attracted some amazing gods and goddesses. Maybe "separation" really IS the obstacle to be overcome, as one of my spiritual books insists. Maybe as we heal this sorry alienation between the genders by learning the true value of these simple gifts (and greater intimacy in the same vein), it really *will* make it easier to align with the Divine. Certainly, that seems to be happening in small ways already.
Whatever the case, it's fun to see the new scenery as we round the bend. And fun to know that it wouldn't be happening without all of us somehow contributing our input, doubts, fears and breakthroughs and now this new Vision of strong, healing people ready for the next phase...whatever that may turn out to be. I hope I can step up to the new vibration.
End of ramble.
Soulsearching
titled your piece 'pure wisdom' I'd go further and call it poetic wisdom. Some of the things said in this blog entry have brought up more issues which I have had to deal with. I know that I am at the beginning of a long journey back to myself and I’ll have to pass a lot of debris on the way. It is a painful process and the anesthesia is sadly only a click away. There are a lot of stumbling stones out there and the infamous 'gap'. But I know that I can always rely on someone on this site when I find the going too tough and to be there if I fall. The wonderful members on this site give their all and I try to give too because giving to others is wonderful. But what I must try to learn now is how to interpret life differently and be open to receiving all the wisdom which is being offered.
Pure Wisdom
is this site. All of you writing here: Discordia, Hotspring, Richard, G8, Heyduke and Marnia are giving me pure wisdom with your words.
Wherever we come from, wherever the starting point was.We started with discomfort, pain, loneliness, fear, grief. We needed something else, we wanted something we did not have. We started to search and to change. Some of us met at this site, some in other communities, we learned and we grew. We could become what we first could not even imagine.
Some can not set free yet, some are already flying. It is very hard for the one that can not fly to see the world the same way as the one with wings. Still the earthbound and the flyer could both benefit from each other. Eventually we can all meet in the air.
Thanks all. Wherever you come from, wherever you want to go. Wherever you are today.
From habit to harmony (sorry Marnia could not resist to steal it)
/ Soulsearching
BFO means
"blinding flash of the obvious" and this thread has great perspective from everyone with lots of BFO's that I receive, thanks!
A BFO that occurred to me this morning is just this - my attraction to Reuniting is as a community where I can work out my "stuff" - be it porn, masturbation, relationships, spirituality, etc. - with the loving support of a gracious community of men and women on a like minded spiritual path.
You are right Marnia, we are all, in our own way, making progress! Wow!
That's it! Reuniting is the on line equivalent of the SLAA meetings I do FACE TO FACE, where I meet with men and women together in a safe, spiritual place where we practice the rigorous honesty we find here. The best part - getting smiles and hugs - the very bonding behaviors we talk about here.
SLAA chat on line is limited in how you can express things there and they discourage male/female interactions because people get hit on. Here, we have deep, thoughtful "verbal intercourse" on line that is the best start towards the sexual intimacy we intend to manifest when the right connection is found face to face.
Richard
Healing
Well, since I was the guy who suggested women stand up for themselves here, let me explain a little more about what I meant. We want to heal the gap, that is help women let go of their fear, whatever it is that's holding them back from posting more and thereby partaking of the sense of community and support the site offers.
I thought about what they might be afraid of, and I think the answer is pretty obvious. The fear is of being treated with disrespect in some form. Possibly hit on, but maybe just the idea that a lot of men here were porn users gives the impression of something scary.
My idea was that it'd be a good thing to not let fear stop you, to face it. IF something happens, then deal with it. I agree it'd be useless to do that on mySpace or some seedy bar, but this is a place of healing. Unlike those other places, most likely you'd get support here, and that's healing. To have a voice, and to have that voice heard. To see that it does turn around, that it might actually happen much less than you fear.
More importantly, however, it's to just open and be vulnerable that way. Most likely, the responses will be supportive, even if coming from ex porn users. That would be healing too.
I don't know how the part of the site dedicated to porn addiction came into being, since I just got here, but I suspect it came just from addicts coming and posting, talking about their journey. If that's the case, I think people with other journeys, if they started posting about them, would create a similar thing. Facing the fear is the first step.
This goes for everyone, not just the gap Discordia is talking about. I'm into the spiritual side and the sexual alchemy side (hence my handle, Tantra11, since Tantra encompasses both... the 11 is just a bit of numerology tacked on for fun
). I'm also single for the time being, and while the site encourages bonding with a partner, it also supports my current (soon to be ending, I hope) journey of celibacy if I open up about it.
So, Hotspring, keep those posts of yours coming about things like dreams or advanced physics. (Speaking of dreams, did you see my first blog entry?) I wanted to respond to both these topics, but it didn't seem like I knew enough about the subject to converse fluently. That's MY fear at work.
Which leads me back to the gap between porn users and the silent women. Is there something we men can do to make things more supportive for you to feel safe?
I doubt that women aren't
I doubt that women aren't posting because they don't feel safe. Women really aren't as fragile as you think - more likely they're just pissed off and fed up.
I would guess women aren't posting because
1) porn use has already done so much damage to their sense of men and themselves, why should they spend their free time trying to help people who have caved in to unhealthy patterns that reinforce negative attitudes towards women? Seems things should be the other way around - the porn users reaching out to the women, not vice versa.
2) Since most women are not addicted to porn, they may not be able to relate and probably have more interesting things to do with their time, and
3) after all, you did this to yourselves. If women had been complicit in getting you hooked, there might be a larger sense of responsibility there, and
4) It's just downright depressing to see how easily controlled men are.
I don't claim these reasons are good ones, but they are all things I've felt at various times reading porn addicts posts here. I'm glad I've largely overcome them. If the problem of porn addiction weren't so widespread, I'd probably have no interest in the topic. But because porn addiction has become something I have to reckon with not just on this site, but as a part of being a single woman in a modern, computer-based society in which the majority of available men seem to have an affinity for porn, I just can't ignore the problem. I'm very interested in societal trends and feel some responsibilty towards affecting them for the best possible future humans can conceive of. I'm just not willing to settle for this, ignore it, or do the only other thing possible - get into watching porn or trying to act like a porn star in bed just so as to relate to modern men. The other option besides settling, ignoring, or playacting is to do what Marnia does - engage, be frank, and accept that the problem can only be overcome through cooperation of the sexes.
Fear and Anger
This post is making me have to walk my talk. It pushes my buttons. I'm trying to offer help and get back (what I interpret as) an attack. I don't take anger from others well, attacking me for my love. This is exactly what I was talking about except in reverse. People have a lot of healing to do, and this is what I'm working on in myself. Why do I let posts like this trigger me? What's the lesson here? Was it even really an attack? If the women on this site aren't posting out of fear or anger or both, there's a lesson there too, and that's what this is all about. To help and be helped, even if it gets ugly sometimes. Healing is hard. We all have a lot to fear as well as to be angry about, but the journey is to let go, return these two emotions to their proper place. They serve a purpose, but like all powerful tools, can be easily misused. Sometimes it's gonna get messy, but it's worth it.
I was just trying to share
I was just trying to share what I thought were the reasons why women might not post here, since that was the topic of conversation. I wasn't trying to attack you in any way, but I am aware that honesty can be uncomfortable - it's certainly not the kind of feedback you're used to getting from virtual encounters with women. I bring up the points I do with the honesty I do because I presuppose that everyone who comes here is trying to have a real conversation.
Marnia will treat every one of you like angels - you can count on that. Because she really believes it. And it's not that I DON'T believe it intellectually, its just that I haven't been able to fully let go of my grudges yet. Having open and honest conversations with men on this site has helped somewhat though.
I am not posting in this site only to be here as a support for you men, I'm here to explore my own attitudes as well. I don't claim to represent all women, but I do share my perspectives based off my own experience and what I perceive in the other women in my life. Anger is a huge part of that.
Perhaps we could have a conversation about women's anger and how you feel around angry women, how you deal with it, what you think the causes are, how it can be resolved?
Please know that I value your honesty as well.
Now this is really going to
Now this is really going to get me in trouble, but I'm going to say it anyway: You say you don't like to be attacked for your love, but what it seems to me you are presenting is a sort of partial love: loving the man in you who is being sensitive to all the timid or fearful women out there, who is wanting to care for and bring out of her shell the vulnerable woman. Please don't misunderstand me, I know your intentions are pure. But is that scenario really coming from love, or from an idealized view of yourself dependent on a two-dimensional view of women?
Not quite so much love and support offered the angry and blunt women . . . That's okay with me, because I don't come to the forum for love. I come to it for sharing, confrontation, exploration, insight.
Again, I'm open to any insights you may have into how I may be misconstruing reality or disservicing myself by my attitude towards men.
The sexes have plenty
of *excellent* reasons to be fed up with each other. But what has always intrigued me about spiritual growth is that it inevitably seems to come as the result in a shift in perception that lets one see the situation differently from before.
I know that for me, the insight that the way we usually use sex is clouding our perception of each other (making men and women look more threatening to each other, and causing defensive reactions) has been just such an insight. It has allowed me to forgive my own ugly behavior...and, by extension, the behavior of pretty much everyone else. After all, we're all trying to cope with the same hangover...or unsatisfying loneliness (another perception-clouder).
The beneficial shifts in perception always seem to come from "outside the box." That is, they usually aren't the product of rehashing the obvious facts. However, they also arrive in their own time...and sometimes a bit of "fact rehashing" is vitally important to allowing them to bubble up.
So I hope you two will hash away, but I ask that you also hold the goal of allowing new perspectives to bubble up, should that occur. You may surprise yourselves.
Personally,
Hotspring's remarks touch the part of me that deeply senses that one benefit of learning to rechannel our sexual energy is that both partners feel a lot stronger. This makes partners tend to welcome strong mates. This is very affirming to us power goddesses. It means all the gifts, energy and vision we have to share can more easily find their way out into the world, and that we can help our mates do the same.
The recipe of today' popular sex habits is leaving men feeling unnaturally drained...and perhaps unnaturally drawn to women they perceive as compliant or weak or "tamed" (like the women in most porn scenarios). At the very least it may make men more comfortable with less forthright women...even though the men don't perceive that they are often being manipulated. (Think "southern belle, iron fist in velvet glove.")
This can be disturbing to those of us women who cultivate honesty, and seek a strong, equal partnership.
To shift direction a bit, Deida's work disturbs me because he correctly advises men to strengthen themselves, but encourages women to orgasm. This will make them very hard to live with, because it is weakening them in another way. I'm sure he doesn't realize this. But his model seems most unwise because it does not encourage strong equal partnerships.
Deida
Someone needs to tell him about the effects orgasm has on women. I believe you, but I had no idea. How could I? How could he? It seems like just a positive thing, probably to women themselves as well. We all would have had to go through the process of discovery you did.
Despite this flaw, however, I believe that he does encourage strong equal partnerships. The equality just respects the difference between masculine and feminine power... which unfortunately makes it seem similar to the old misogynistic ways. It isn't though. The old misogynistic way honored the masculine/feminine dynamic while suppressing the female. Society advanced and went to the other extreme, ignoring or even dishonoring the masculine/feminine dynamic in its attempt to gain equality. Deida's teachings is to find a way to true harmony where the masculine/feminine dynamic is once again honored but where both sexes are still equal. More than just equal in fact, as they help each other more fully fulfill their potential. It's a synergy rather than oppression and manipulation.
It's not orgasm or porn that makes men more comfortable with less forthright women. That's just how the dynamic is. Feminine power is simply not going to be forthright, and if the feminine tries to be forthright and express power like a man, it comes out as bitchy. She will never reach full potential power by imitating masculine power. The southern belle with iron fist in a velvet glove is a good way to describe feminine power, and it's not necessarily manipulative. Manipulation is when someone tricks another into doing something against their interest. Well, the more forthright masculine power can certainly also be used to get someone to do something against their interest. It's not the type of power that's the problem but what you do with it.
Female power
In a similar vein, if men try to tell women how they can and can't use power, they will just come off as #@$holes. }
[bigsmile]
B&A
Yes, I will fight for the right for any woman to be as bitchy as she wants.
And if I want to dress up like a southern belle and put on velvet gloves, that right should not be barred from me!
.gif" alt="smiley"/>. But seriously, I didn't mean to make it sound like a commandment or anything. I'm actually for feminism. Nobody should be discriminated against, not for gender, race, weight, looks, sexual orientation, or anything else, cuz that's just ugly and stupid.
Personally,
I like Deida's vision. Perhaps our insights will intersect one of these days, and the result will be a healthy polarity between the sexes.
Polarity
I still wonder, though, if polarity, which leads to passion, will lead to orgasmic sex. Well, I look forward to working on this puzzle ASAP.
Honesty
I'm glad you recognize your grudges and are working on letting them go. Me too. You may not have meant to attack, but if your words come from a background of anger, which they seem to, that will show through. I know because I've done it, and even when I was trying my best to not do it, being very, very conscious and careful, it would still happen. Like it's happening right now. Geez. I hope you can see past it to the love underneath. Really.
I'm also glad for your honesty, but I hope you realize that there was more there than just honesty. If you're honest with yourself, you'll see that. If I write an e-mail to someone I'm angry with, and I know my anger is showing through, I don't rationalize to myself that I'm just being honest and that honesty makes people uncomfortable. I admit what I'm doing, acknowledge it, and do my best. Like I said, healing is hard. We just have to forgive each other each time the other slips up... As long as both parties are genuinely working toward resolution, that's a good thing.
I think having the discussion you suggest about me, women, and anger would be good to have. Same with a discussion about you and your issues with men.
Now, on to your second post: Everyone has fear. Everyone, and working with it is an essential part of spiritual growth for everyone, not just women. And not necessarily to get rid of it. It's not a bad thing or a weakness. Used properly, it's just as powerful as anger, letting us escape from situations that would cause big problems or even destroy us. The trick is to use it with wisdom, to face it when the instinct is applying it to a situation where it interferes with growth. Anger too needs to be handled with wisdom because we also sometimes apply it in ways that don't serve us, despite it being a powerful force when applied to situations where it should be.
You're right in that it might be harder for me to express love to angry, blunt women. It's because I still let myself be hurt by them, but I still have the love. I care about everyone and their problems if I step back from my own issues long enough to see it.
You say you're open to insights about how you may be misconstruing reality or disservicing yourself. Well, I think your anger is a disservice to you, just like mine is a disservice to me. It hurts us. It blinds us. It makes us misconstrue reality. Yet, we hang on to it because in another way, it's still serving us. It protects us. The trick is to replace it with something, and only then we can honor it and let it go, thank it for its service before we healed and found something better.
I think you read some things into my words that weren't there. I, in my reaction, did the same. We can't really help it, not as long as we have our buttons that can be pushed. The pain that led to the button's formation can be healed, but until then, the best we can do is look at ourselves honestly. I had to ask myself, "Was Hotspring really attacking me?" And I ask you to ask yourself, "Was Tantra really looking at women as two-dimensional?" Honestly, I probably do have a bit of the male-rescuer energy in me, and you did vent a little on me... but that's not where our hearts were.
Hi. I lost internet
Hi. I lost internet connection for a few days so am only now getting back to you.
Yes, I agree with most of what you say and I think that the main point is that our intentions are in the right places even if we still have some growing to do. I don't think that I was consciously using the guise of honesty to hide my anger – I was being as self-honest as my level of awareness at the time allowed, which is about the most we can ever do.
But now that you’ve helped me to gain some insight, it might be more appropriate for me to rephrase my four points with more self-honestly. I might not have done this the first time around because I was trying not to make it too personal and therefore accusatory. But it didn’t work. Let me put my previous statements, my haughty anger in “I” terms. Let me affirm right here that my anger has taken the form of judgement, something that could easily be perceived as attack tho I was not intentionally doing this:
1) I judge porn addicts because they think mostly of their own suffering. I feel angry at this because I feel that they are reinforcing and contributing to unhealthy expectations of women that perpetrate an essentially violent and misogynistic cultural climate, one that women have already dealt too long with, and now expect women to support them. This expectation irritates me. I think that they have some serious amends to make.
2) Since I’m not a porn addict, I may not always post because I cannot relate to you as regards the particulars of porn addiction (However, I can relate to you as regards addiction in general).
Points 3) and 4) basically express my exasperation at what I judge to be men’s weakness.
If this comes across as even MORE blunt and accusatory, know that my intention is to really examine WHICH beliefs I hold about men that, as you point out , are NOT of service to me! I am not going into the thick of this ONLY to jab and poke, but at the same time I must admit that I guess some part of me really just wants to put men through the ringer, to the test. A part of me wants a duel, a confrontation. I do enjoy a good verbal joust more than many things. Especially in a forum.
Archetypically, I identify with Artemis the most. She was a supporter of women. We can see the Artemis archetype most strongly in modern women who uphold the feminist cause: people like Gloria Steinem. However, Artemis could also be ruthless. There's a story I should look up again - I forget who the gods and goddesses were, but Artemis witnesses one God trying to rape a young girl and she turned him to stone. She was known to come to the aid of other women. I would like to think that I am only angry about injustice and disrespect to women to the extent that injustices and disrespect exist. I would like to think that if these injustices were finally eradicated, I would happily put down my weapons and shield and find a new identity. But we won't know this until that time comes. In the meantime, I'll speak up, knowing also that I have many other identities besides Artemis - I have many Hera and Aphrodite qualities as well. But they're not as likely to come up in a venue like this. It's not so easy here for me to balance some of my words out with a nice back rub, some home cooking, and a little flirty eye contact to smooth the edges.
I also agree that I may be holding on to my anger and grudges because it serves a certain purpose for me - and I thank you for pointing out that it is a disservice. I think that's clear. But the observation doesn't provide a solution. The question for me is not whether I am disservicing myself, but what to do about it.
As Marnia points out, we can always find innumerable justifications to uphold our positions. We have to ask ourselves if we want to be right, or we want to be free. Most of us on this site think we want to be free, but we don't always make the right choices that would really allow that.
Freedom
What a powerful reply. Thank you.
I think when you put your four points in first-person, it was less accusatory, not more. At least that's how I felt, and I think I did because then it was about you and your pain and reaction. The other way was less vulnerable, more divisive. Personally, I don't like verbal jousting, so please save that for people who do. I had a friend like that in high school, and he drove me nuts.
Do you think that (point #1) an addict's selfishness bothers you because you yourself also think mostly of your own suffering? (Projection, to use the psychological term. BTW, you do know that I'm not a porn addict, don't you? Just making sure. I didn't appreciate the comment about me and virtual encounters with women. I let it go though, cuz I know how hard it is to hold anger back. And probably it shouldn't be. All this said, I, like you, can definitely relate to addictive patterns, like if I use masturbation or the computer to escape from life.)
I like the Artemis archetype. Strong women attract me, and I think I have a little of the Actaeon archetype in me. Hopefully we both will embody the positive aspects of these archetypes and leave behind the negative.
About a solution to the anger we hold... well, if you find one, let me know. I've met people who've let it go and always ask them how they did it. What they say makes it sound so easy, and it's always the same--they just let it go, forgave. They say things like, "Well, I realized I love my dad," or "The anger just wasn't worth it anymore." One guy told me the story about the two dogs, one vicious, the other loving, and the two forces are in conflict. Which one wins? The one you feed. What this tells me is that if we react to each other's anger with more anger, we're feeding the wrong dog, but if we react with love, even if it feels like shit to do so, biting our tongue the whole way, slowly the dog of love will grow while the dog of hate starts to fade. Why is it so hard to feed the right dog? It's because the dog of hate serves a purpose. My strategy is to find out what the purpose is. I keep looking and looking, and eventually I find something, have a realization, and let go of part of the problem. Other teachers of mine say this isn't necessary, that I don't need to figure out the purpose, just keep on feeding the dog of love. This is hard to do, though. If I'm honest with myself, there's a part of me that does NOT want to feed that dog. My friend once got into positive affirmations. Ugh, I knew it would be good for me, but no way. My excuse was that the affirmations were so hoaky. "I'm a winner!" (puke) Another friend recommended a Chi Kung practice called the Inner Smile where you put a smile on your face, think joyful thoughts, and send them down into the body. Again, a part of me bristled with resistance, and I don't understand it because I think I love myself, have high self-esteem, and don't have any self-hatred. Well, it took me a couple years, but I've started doing these "feed the right dog" practices. The resistance is still there but less. What helped, I think, was fixing my environment. I started listening to my body, taking care of it, rather than treating it as a mule, a mere vehicle for my aspirations. I did what I had to do for me, allowed that selfishness. This awakened a tiny glimmer of love in me, and now it can spread. Recently someone told me this is how it has to start, with self-love, self-forgiveness. Her reasoning had to do with complex Chinese medical theory about anger, coming from the liver, being unable to be released because of lung energy, but whether you believe that stuff or not (I'm not sure I do), I think there was wisdom there. I've tried to forgive my parents, but after months of praying for them, loving them, the whole shebang, it just seemed to make my anger worse. So now I'm starting smaller, starting with myself, being a friend to myself, and I'm branching out to others. I pray for my friends. I try to help others when I can. I always did, but now I consciously work to open my heart when I do it, not doing it out of some sense of duty but out of love. It seems to be taking awhile for the dog of anger to starve, probably because I still feed it sometimes, but it will happen. I just gotta keep going.
Your path might be different, but somehow I'm getting the feeling that in a lot of ways, we're like two peas in a pod. We're angry. We have powerful intellects. Our intellect can look at our emotional body and know everything about it, yet that doesn't change anything. Not right away at least. Well, hopefully we can help each other along the way if we can keep from tearing each other's throats out.
Tearing eachother's throats
Tearing eachother's throats out? I don't feel quite that ruthless, not even close. As far as I'm concerned this whole interaction is an enjoyable exercise, a back and forth coming from two willing people. If all I really enjoyed was war and violence, I wouldn't take the time to explain myself or share which of your viewpoints resonate with me. There is creativity in tension, and that's why it doesn't bother me. I engage in it to the extend that it remains creative. Confrontation can be a part of that, but I am not here to wage allout war!
You say, "Hopefully we both will embody the positive aspects of these archetypes and leave behind the negative." But then that requires judgement. A feeling is a feeling. I don't think that anger is a negative feeling, or that negative feelings should be avoided. The danger, I think, lies in how much we identify with the feeling. If we are able to have a broader perspective on ourselves, a sort of witnessing presence that we know is our true identity, then we can explore our feelings without so much charge and identity invested in them.
I actually don't even come here to joust, but I will when the need arises, such as when I encounter statements like this: "Feminine power is simply not going to be forthright, and if the feminine tries to be forthright and express power like a man, it comes out as bitchy. She will never reach full potential power by imitating masculine power."
Now, I know words are merely words, jousting with them is tricky business because you can't do so fairly until the terms are properly defined and agreed upon - which can be a tiresome business indeed! The implication of the sentence above is that all forms of being forthright in women are imitations of male power, and that a forthright woman is not in touch with her true femininity. I hope this isn't what you're saying. My guess is that it probably isn't, since you say you like strong Artemis type women.
I don't think that as a culture we really even know what a healthy form of empowerment as embodied by either men or women looks like. And I feel uneasy even with the idea of a "female power" versus a "male power". I think that overall, our culture misconstrues force as power. To that extent I agree that when and if women try to be forceful over others, they are abusing power. We could call this style of abusing power male, but then that's a disservice to men. But being forthright is a very different thing than being forceful. Its natural and human to stand up for oneself if injustice or infringement occurs - that's a natural response that has nothing to do with gender. Should a mama bear not protect her cub because she's afraid she'll be in danger of immitating masculine power? What a bitchy bear! My point is that every indipendent organism is called on to be forthright and self-defining of boundaries for self-actualization numerous times in their lives. Had women not been forthright, we wouldn't even be able to vote!
Oh and one final last thing, thank you for pointing out that you are not a porn addict. That's another thing about this forum, there are so many its hard to keep track of them all, so I do apologize for putting you in that category.
I remember
some years back...as I contemplated that societal assumption that "power=force"... what it would be like to combine power with gentleness.
I decided I really liked the image of "infinitely gentle and infinitely powerful." Metaphysically, it made perfect sense, too. If you get back what you give out, then ultimate safety lies in non-force. However, it's far easier to reach for this goal when all parties are using their sexual energy in a way that promotes balance from within.
At the same time, I confess that I cannot imagine this combination of gentleness and power without forthrightness on the part of both genders.
For Gary and me, being able to be honest and forthright is a reflection of deep feelings of safety with each other. We often do a much better job on joint projects because we both know we can say, "that needs work. Here's what I think is wrong with it."
I see the dialog here as that type of mutual gift. It can lead to greater insight..and already seems to be doing so.
Deida
Deida's teachings are easy to misunderstand, and I've noticed that even people who've gone to his seminars and read all his books still tend to think of his teachings as "doctrine" or something that should be applied all the time, a guide to life or something. They're not. It sounds like you and Gary have created a beneficial interaction between two peers, and there's no need to bring a masculine/feminine dynamic to that. Deida's example, I think, is doing the bills. Husband and wife sit down, do the bills, and it's like you describe, forthright, an equal exchange. It'd be comical to force a masculine/feminine dynamic on that! But then, after the bills are done, the trick is to shift gears when it's time to go to bed. If you stay non-polarized (and aren't into karezza), one or both parties won't be getting their needs met.
I think you're onto something there
I definitely switch to a very *yin* mode in the bedroom. This is partly because I have learned that a focus on "performance" is counter-productive when it comes to karezza. I therefore *receive,* I do not *demand.* And Gary does not *ask*, he *pilots.*
And yet the result is a finely tuned, attentive dance, in which both of us are very sensitive and generous toward each other.
Deida
Ah, so the masculine/feminine dynamic does still come into play with karezza. That's good, cuz I was kinda thrown for a loop, knowing karezza is right for me, yet knowing the Deida stuff is too. There seemed to be a conflict.
Here's another thing Deida says happens and is part of how to use sex and the masculine/feminine polarity for spiritual growth: When the feminine trusts the masculine presence during sex, she opens in surrender, which then draws the man to surrender also and become vulnerable himself, which is harder for the masculine.
I wonder... would it help to emphasize or otherwise bring these aspects of karezza to light more? Right now, the science, the relationship, and the esoteric are emphasized but not the Deida-like stuff. Maybe some of the resistance some people have to karezza is that it's not passionate enough? If so, bringing in the idea of Deida-like polarity might help? I don't know. Just throwing this idea out there, despite me having very little experience with either karezza or polarity. The way I see it, the gender neutralization, in addition to porn, are both factors in modern society that need reform.
Hmm... on second thought, maybe both Deida polarity and karezza are both so counter to the mainstream that to hope to have both at the same time might be too much to ask. I'm going for it, but maybe I and my mate will be the only ones.
.gif" alt="smiley"/>. Might have to just feel our own way in that case!
You will feel your way
to some extent. I just hope you'll share what you learn. There's much still to fine tune.
I do discuss polarity in the book's description of karezza. I should have put it in my article, too. Not sure why I didn't. I usually explain that under Taoist tradition, "the man is the pilot, and the woman is the boat." In fact, it is my belief that her total receptiveness actually helps the man maintain control. All that yang energy needs to be "received" (emotionally too) for the circuit to be complete and stable. (This is also why a gradual approach like the Exchanges is helpful. Because she can't be expected to open up immediately...trust must build. And he can't be expected to control himself immediately...because she isn't completely open and receptive yet.)
Now, as for passion...quite honestly...I'm not sure that *does* fit into the picture. At least I could never wedge it in without destabilizing things. However, that doesn't mean lovemaking is unsatisfying. My husband is not given to poetic phrases and he often says "this is heaven" when we're connected.
I know that sounds weird, but all I can figure is that our nervous systems really have gradually shifted in some way that makes contentment possible on the "less is more" diet. *chuckle*
Feeling
I hope to begin feeling my way soon, and will post what I find on what will surely be a glorious journey. Thanks for the advance guidance... wish I could go deeper in this discussion, but that will have to wait until I have experience!
Enjoyable
Good, good. It has become enjoyable for me too, though it didn't start out that way. After my last post, I realized that a lot of my feeling "attacked" was probably because you read my words as having come from a porn addict, which colored your response in a way you wouldn't have if you knew. Were I a porn addict, I'd have definitely worded things differently to try and be sensitive to things like your four points and been more sympathetic to your anger. Glad that's behind us.
Have you read the big book of AA? That helped me a lot in understanding that addiction leads to behavior that really is NOT under conscious control AT ALL. Addiction comes from the mid-brain, and though the actions seem under conscious control (a fore-brain thing), they really are not. An alcoholic KNOWS down to his deepest core, that if he takes another drink, he will keep drinking, ruin his life, and ruin his family's life... and then he takes that drink. Same with porn addiction. The porn addict might feel horrible about what they're doing, but they simply cannot stop. Might as well ask them to learn how to control their heart beat. It's not under conscious control or a matter of will power because the forces driving the behavior are below and therefore stronger than reason and logic. 12-step programs work because they accept this truth and do what it takes to break the cycle. Anyway, maybe your anger towards them comes from believing that they could stop if only they'd want to. It's simply not true. They can be good people who feel terrible about what they're doing, but they're controlled by a disease. It's like a rabid dog. It's the disease making the dog violent, not the dog itself.
About archetypes. A feeling is a feeling that shouldn't be judged, I agree. But an archetype is more than a single feeling. For example, the Artemis archetype, if taken too far, produces a man-hater, but in it's good aspect, an independent female master of something (not necessarily hunting, but probably something generally done by men) who is comfortable in a role not usually assumed by women. The Actaeon archetype, if taken too far, produces a man who's threatened by Artemis and tries to subjugate her, but in it's good aspect, is a man who sees the feminine in a strong woman. The myth provides a good lesson for Actaeon types. Actaeon was not in integrity when he approached her and paid with his life. (Integrity = Oxytocin/Bonding/Abundance/Love.
.gif" alt="smiley"/>.)
You're right in that I didn't mean to say a woman can't be forthright without then being in imitation of male power or out of touch with her femininity. I just meant that if she tries to be powerful in a masculine way, it might not be as powerful as she can be. And yes, sometimes a woman might need to become a "bitchy bear," like if physical danger is involved or to revolutionize an entire society. Likewise a man might need to "stoop to conquer" if the situation requires that strategy (ninjutsu, for example, or Tai Chi). My point was that if the feminine is a bitchy bear all the time, or the masculine prefers ninja tactics to forthright samurai ways, they're doing themselves a disservice.
Now, about Power vs. Force. (I have read Hawkins's first book but not the others.) Force is when power is applied without integrity. Others get sacrificed for your selfishness end. Power, however, has integrity and works for the common good. This is a very powerful distinction, but female power vs. male power is a different topic. The masculine commands through Presence. The feminine influences through Radiance. Notice I said "masculine" and "feminine," not "men" and "women." Bitchy bear and ninjutsu have their place. Also, some women might simply be masculine, and men can be feminine in their core. So it's not a physical gender thing at all. There might be times when a man shines or a woman is aggressive, and it's not only appropriate but beautiful. However, if that same man or woman starts using the gender-style that doesn't suit them too often, they undermine their power. I've stuffed my masculinity trying to fit in with what I thought society and women wanted, and I've paid for that. Now I know better. The trick is to learn what true masculinity is, the kind with integrity, whereas before, I thought it was "Force" not "Power." That's what society tends to teach now, so I picked up the wrong approach. "Bitchy" is also Force rather than Power, and I think a lot of women make the same mistake I made except in reverse, where they think they have to become masculine to have power. When they do this, it tends to come out as "Force" because it's not coming from their source of true strength, but even if it does come out as "Power," it might have been even more powerful if it flowed in harmony with, rather than against, their feminine core energy.
Would you explain this some more?
Can you explain why you want and enjoy those things?
I'm pretty much the opposite - I seriously DISlike verbal confrontation. Perhaps that's because I'm so bad at it. As an only child, I didn't get a lot of practice, and my parents were so reasonable and logical about what they asked and expected of me that arguing with them was a sure-fire way to make a fool of myself.
I also dislike the idea of being "tested". It's like the tester is taking on the role of a judge, complete with black robe, sitting on a high bench and deciding my fate. And out of respect for the Golden Rule, I wouldn't think of testing others.
Sure thing, Curious Fellow
Sure thing, Curious Fellow -
My enjoyment of a good verbal debate probably comes from my upbringing. As you probably already know, I grew up in a very unique place - 400 acres of land managed through a consensus-based community of 50 people. That is to say, I grew up amongst people who took the time and made it a priority to engage in dialogue. Oftentimes, this dialogue was very emotionally charged. People didn't run away from conflict, they worked through it and resolved it for the most part. Many of them have now learned to see tension as holding huge creative potential, and disagreement as a sign of a healthy and diverse group of people. This perspective didn't happen overnight. The communication skills necessary to see the positive sides of differences in opinion have come over time. The point is, I think, that if you are able to engage in dialogue without too much investment in the outcome, and are able to learn to frame your own unique perspective within a larger context of the benefit of the whole, the solutions that are finally found through this approach will be better-informed overall. The key is to enjoy the process, keep perspective, and learn to listen to what others have to say as well.
I like coming here to talk about sexual politics because I feel that for the most part, my culture really isn't having these conversations. Dialogue and debate are signs of health. A culture of people avoiding the hard stuff isn't going to progress and grow, in my opinion.
But I also know that there are certain types of people who especially enjoy debate. My father being one of them. He's an extremely smart and well-informed person. He will often take an opposite viewpoint not to be contrary, but because he assumes that it is better to look at something from all angles before resting on a solution. My mother, on the other hand, finds his manner combative. She longs to have a conversation with him, not a debate. What for him is fun, creative exchange, feels to her like impersonal debate. So I realize not everyone is like me or my father. But I must say that my mother really enjoys watching my father and I debate. See, she tells me about her perspectives in the relationship and a lot of times I end up sticking up for her perspective in a way that she for some reason isn't able to do for herself. She just loves to hear me bring up her points in a really lucid and concrete way with my dad, in a way that he can't so easily dismiss.
She often feels dismissed by him. And yes, that's what it's like in a debate. You have to try to hold your ground at least to some extent and give that viewpoint a chance. If you back down immediately, no exchange happens.
But of course there are many other ways of exchanging besides debate. And this is my mother's point. She doesn't want to learn to debate because she doesn't enjoy it. She gets hurt easily, takes it personally. When really its not in the least personal. It's an exercise in ideas.
Now that I think about it, it might be people who are really into problem solving who love debate. They do so with the presupposition that the debate is taking place ideally to find a better solution to a common problem. The potential for finding this solution makes the confrontation and the sometimes difficult feelings that arise worthwhile, because its assumed and known apriori that the debate is not being had for the purposes of personal attack or advancement. It's done in the spirit of grappling with larger societal problems or challenges.
But of course, the political is personal. The reason that certain societal problems so urgently need solutions, is because we know that how we approach and define them determines how we live our lives. Society affects us personally. So, there are certain topics that affect me more personally than others - such as how women are treated in society, that I have a vested interest in exploring, improving, and engaging. Naturally I'm more charged about these topics that affect me directly. But, being a woman, which means being part of the human race, I know also that what is a disservice to me is also a disservice to men. I don't see how it could be possible that one half of the human race could suffer and the other half could benefit, because we life toghether and belong together. Therefore, if I as a woman suffer, men will consequently suffer. So the frame of reference may start with personal exprience, but the gravity of the questions comes from the fact that we're all in it together. And if that is the case, we may as well be frank and forthright (I really like that word "forthright" now) about what our experience is like, so that we can communicate. And if feelings of defensiveness, or combativeness, or anger come up, well that's all just part of the show. But its not what the show is about, it just surfaces. Another feeling that could surface would be vengeance, or revenge. When I feel that, that's when I want to put men through the ringer and to the test. But that's not all I feel, and its not my only motivation. Just something to be witnessed and perhaps even enjoyed. Aren't women even a little bit cute sometimes when they get pissed off? Well, Zoe sounds like a real bull/bully, but it is sometimes cute when people take themselves so seriously. So the trick is to still be sensitive to them but to know also that that is their little life's drama, and if they can use it to become more articulate and expressive, then its all for the better - so long as you as the witness are able as well not to let it get too wrapped up in your own drama.
I once
started a woman's singing group at a community. We would perform once a month at "open mic" night, and the sole goal was to be entertaining and enjoy ourselves.
New women who joined were generally taken aback when they first came to a rehearsal because we all argued with each other (vehemently) about how to stage performances. "No! That won't work." "Bad idea." "I think we should..." and so forth.
But soon the newcomers would also join in enthusiastically...and the results were always *much* better and more original than any one of us could have come up with alone. I grew to love watching each performance come together. The more vigorous the dissent, the more confident I was that the next performance would be a zinger!
The experience taught me what Hotspring learned in her early life. Synergy can produce things that individual brilliance cannot...but only if everyone knows they will be heard and challenged...and allowed to rethink, restate, figure out what they *really* meant and chime in again, etc. Really exciting things surface in this kind of fertile environment.
It's also true that such an environment can be bruising...and can even *discourage* diverse opinions, if care is not taken to make quieter voices feel equally welcome and vital to a discussion. So if anyone has thoughts on how we can better achieve this here, speak up. Your views are welcome.
Thanks
for the detailed reply.
"Aren't women even a little bit cute sometimes when they get pissed off?" Oh, maybe, if the anger isn't directed at me. They would probably be cuter if they weren't angry.
I think your explanation here
I think your explanation here is quite thought-provoking, and this discussion is helping me to understand the contributors on a deeper level than I have up to this point, especially hotspring, as I've been reading your posts for about a year now.
As you know, I also had a unique upbringing, although mine was a bit more twisted and sadistic. I think that your upbringing really helped you to achieve a level of confidence in your ideas and opinions that maybe some of us were not given. In my case, I was not really allowed to express myself in the ways that you were actually encouraged to do.
I'm bringing this up mostly in response to the idea that it may be problem solvers that especially love debate. I really do consider myself a "problem solver," it's what brought me here, it's what drives me in my education, and yet I'm not a debate lover. I've still not reached that level of self-assured-ness that allows for complete openness on my part, and sometimes debates *feels* like a personal attack, and therefore, I react like the wounded animal I am at the time.
It's difficult to avoid confrontation in the real world, and I don't attempt to avoid it all the time. I do what needs to be done and stand up for myself, but for me, gentleness is a much better way to communicate with or persuade me.
However, watching others debate can be pretty entertaining.
You're so articulate and
You're so articulate and sharp, Discordia! I've enjoyed every one of your posts.
And Curious Fellow - of course women are more cute when they aren't debating. But we have more of a purpose here than being merely cute to men at all times. So, when a really important topic comes up, its no big deal if we show a little fang or edge! A debate isn't a place to mate, after all! Debate for most people is not a form of courtship (That said, sharp wits can be a real turn-on) Besides, from what I've read of your posts, it doesn't sound like Zoe is much into debating. She seems more authoritarian than that, not really willing to contextualize her feelings within the larger framework of a partnership, or to really deepy consider your perspective.
Maybe the word debate is a little harsh here. Maybe it just comes down to simple curiosity, a hardy spirit of inquiry. Is there another perspective out there that might be more worthwhile than the one I hold? If someone's offering another perspective, does it hold up well under scrutiny? Is there something that I can learn about myself through confrontation and the rigors of having to articulate myself clearly even in the midst of emotional charge, and in a way that someone else can eventually understand? I'd say yes. You might not even end up changing your position. That's not necessarily the goal. It's a weird combination of stubbornness, open-ended inquiry, curiosity, self-definition, boundary-setting, boundary-dissolving, redefinition, emotional vulnerability, accountability, foolhardiness, pride, and creativity.
There are other options too, ones that Tantra mentioned, and which are much simpler and less time-consuming: simply letting go. There are also times when its really inappropriate to just let go, where doing so is irresponsible and lazy. I think its more in cases of wide-scale abuse of power where it is not okay to just "let it go."
Sure, if the things that trigger me were one even between myself and another man, it would be easier to let things go. But when I see patterns of broadscale dysfunction in society, and oppression or abuse that is systematic and still being reinforced, I have a harder time letting it go, and I question the sanity of doing so. Sure, it's all illusion, its all maya in the end, and there's a point where you're also giving that paradigm energy by paying attention to it at all. But we're here in this projection of maya for a reason (I like to believe, I could be wrong). We have a part to play in how the world unfolds. We're each born into a context, given some raw material to work with. We each slowly find our path of meaning, decide where we want to devote our energy, and sometimes eventually realize where we may be wasting it needlessly.
I hope there will be a day when I am sufficiently happy with the state of human cultural health and the interactions between men and women that I won't be spending my energy on this topic anymore. But if I do reach that place, it will be because I went via this route, and learned along the way, and was willing to go through it.
Maybe
Someone Up There knows that it takes a serious challenge like this to get the sexes to team up again...this time on a healthier footing. I think the compassionate participation of women (friends and mates) can make this addiction a lot easier to overcome.
And what choice do we have? The idea that we can heal the planet with so many men deeply entranced by hypnotic two-dimensional images is wishful thinking. We heal together, or we fall deeper into the limbo that is produced when large percentages of humans are under alien
control. (And, there's something about helping another awaken from a nightmare that shows you where you're still entranced yourself.)
To borrow from the un-PC "Sleeping Beauty" myth, I don't think Prince Charming would have lived happily ever after if he had decided not to thrash his way through the thorns to awaken Briar Rose. So, Ladies, let's put on our all-weather gear and and pull out our gardening tools. Based on my experience with Gary, there can be some splendid souls lurking behind the thorns of addiction. A recovered addict has a combination of humility, compassion, honesty and insight that is tough to find in any other kind of mate.
And keep in mind, it's easier to manifest dreams with a bit of yang energy around. (Our energy does the same for men.)
Yes, it's easy to manipulate men with fertilization opportunities (and anything that looks like it might be one). Think of a male salmon. He'd probably be unable to keep from squirting all over "fake eggs," too.
But women can be just as easy to manipulate - at least when it comes to babies. Did you read about the woman who just had 8 new babies with implanted eggs...when she already had six, no husband and lives in a small house? What manipulated her? Isn't this also "mating neurochemisty run amok?"
Good points all. There are
Good points all. There are obviously extreme cases of women going crazy with babymaking. I don't think most women are absorbed in it to the same degree that men are absorbed in porn. I know amongst my peers, there are intermittent biological urges but certainly that level of appeal to being or getting pregnant is not very widespread - perhaps because pregnancy takes place in REAL LIFE, whereas porn does not. Maybe there could be some kind of online virtual way to feel pregnant that women could get hooked on in the near future.
I think that most of women's attempts to minupale the male urge for fertilization opportunities comes in the form of obsessing about how they look, moreso than in their desire to get pregnant with some random person. But then, that is the main difference between the sexes: the consequences of sexual irresponsibility are a lot more obvious for women, and so we are almost forced to be a bit more reigned in sexually if we are at all intelligent and want to continue to have the freedom to be sexual rather than spending our days nursing and taking care of babies while the men keep running around.
.
.
All About the Healing
I came to this site in early 2008 for information on healing through sexuality, as a logical expansion of healing into all areas of my life. My recovery began in June 2006.
My active addiction spanned some 9 years and caused much destruction to my wife and family both.
In that regard, I agree with you hotspring that most women have been impacted by sexual addiction in today's culture and deserve to be pissed off and weary of men, especially men with these issues.
It is a vicious cycle and I really resonate with Marnia's perspective when she says:
Ironically, I became aware of sacred sexuality in 2004 while in the depth of my addiction and it was a desperate plea for help out of a living hell. It was this part of my journey that put me in touch with Tantra Goddesses. At first, I believed them to be mere prostitutes but soon discovered in my experience with these ladies that they had compassion and understanding like Marnia and they helped me to begin the path of redirecting my sexuality to match my deeper spiritual intent.
I have had more than my fair share of house cleaning these past few years and I currently chose to live a celibate life until the time I can share sacred sex with a committed partner.
My life is incredibly hopeful these days as I realize my hard work of recovery has prepared me to receive a goddess again some day, I know not when. In the interim, I seem to have attracted many women in platonic friendship because my sexuality is not an issue and I pose no threat. I sense, in some small way, that I can contribute to their healing also.
Had there not been women along the way to share their healing energy with me, even in platonic friendship, I am not sure that I could have arrived at where I am today.
Marnia is right - it is all about healing the planet. I know it's cliche but to think globally, we have to act locally. No sane army shoots it's own wounded. Men and women need each other for this healing to take place and we will all be better off for our efforts.
Acceptance leads to forgiveness which leads to unconditional love. Men are stuck because they are threatened to express their truth and be rejected and/or abandoned by the soothing yin energy they are attracted to yet, without the element of truth, no healing can take place.
Reuniting is a wonderful safe place for this healing to unfold.
Richard
re: All About the Healing
Yes, I agree the site is great source of information how to cope with the problem - and major part of it is by sharing experience. If I am allowed to say something near the end of this topic. I would say several words about my experience, hope you do not mind. I write very often with the quite insulting term 'women' which is of course big generalization of my experience only. I do not want to say that I am any kind of expert in that issue, so I'll start from what I know best: 'men'. Why so many of us have such a problem with addiction (I do not have it luckily, despite running imagination that hits the wall of reality created by women's responses, how would it be like, if some women were...) right, what is other option for us, men? I am foreigner in UK since 2007, and traveled here quite a lot (ok, maybe wrong places you will say). Why do I observe every single day is the same cold, automatic, stereotypical reactions from women around me? I could say I didn't really meet any of them being more original than others. And what is original for me? Being WARM, showing that you want that hug, kiss, ask for smile or whatever else you need. I am not surprised that thousands of men masturbate watching stupid pictures or movies and make themselves more miserable than they are, or could be. There is thousand times more life in digital porn than in a cold response from a woman that we prepare to approach, and when asked about having a walk, she respond with ridiculous 'whaaat?'. There is more warmth, and life than when a woman speak about us almost in front with their friends instead just go to us, smile and say her name!!! Or even talk about carrots, trees, roots, pencils, sticks with great confidence and fun (!), while the man in the corner wants to kill himself hearing all of that? So you can now imagine that horrible picture of hundred masturbating men, and ask yourself: am I happy with that? Another pair of shoes are women involved in the porn industry. I would ask them as well, are you happy that many of guys (probably most sensitive and intelligent) are getting addiction through 'imprinting' for your dead digital (but attractive) pictures making by your fellows and become useless in bed??? It seems that basic human nature of a female is to make a huge list of life requirements, where the last one is smiling eyes and hug from a man who is just dying looking at your picture.
Well done women, well done.
P. s / I am not writing about anyone in here, this forum, so anyone offended has my apologizes. Term 'women' as I said is only simple generalization.
And last word. Talking about neurotransmitters, dopamine or synaptic tag and capture is just big bullshit, tribal family didn't need that to make love.
Does it answer your initial question Discordia?
So, remind me again
of the steps you are taking to meet more people? Did you make it to that congregation you were going to try? It's unfortunate that women are nervous around nervous men who seem desperate. I think that if you think about it, you would also be slow to respond warmly to women who seemed that way.
Don't give up, but find ways to connect with *real* groups of people who are open to meeting newcomers. That's where the miracles will occur.