Hangover

Community topics: 

Over the past half year, I've been having orgasms about once a month when alone (this is pretty unbelievable to me), more when I hook up with someone. As I mentioned, Goldenheart and I had a week of orgasms, to see what it would be like to go back to that way of lovemaking. I've been actually pretty surprised at how strong the hangover was, as I've not really felt much of a hangover from the few orgasms I've had over the past six months, and so was beginning to doubt the whole theory. I have felt irritable and a bit mentally unstable, perfectionistic, haughty, snobbish even. Like I'm some sort of countess or princess that becomes more and more stubborn and cold the more the guy grovels at my feet. I've felt a little wicked and cold-hearted, and a bit disturbed at these qualities in myself. The poor soul just wants some warmth - he wants it so bad, the more he wants it the colder I become. It's a perplexing state of affairs, as I objectively know that I enjoy being warm much more than cold.

The nice thing about him and I is we don't hold grudges or dwell on things. We can feel intensely and be in deep confusion, then all of a sudden it reaches a peak, smoothes out, and we're laughing at ourselves.

I think that the hangover from orgasm is greater when I've abstained from it for a long time. I don't think that we're always in deep hangover when having lots of orgasms but just don't notice it because that's our homeostasis. I feel like the intensity of the hangover from having orgasms after having gone without them for so long is more intense because it jolts the system more. I don't think its representative of the state we're always in when having orgasms. I guess I should just speak for myself here, it might be totally different for other people.

I also think there are a lot of compounding factors that affect how intense the hangover is. I'm in a somewhat stressful place in my life right now, so the stress makes it more likely that i'll use orgasm for release rather than as a form of loving expression and generosity. I also think there are many ways of having orgasms, and it makes sense that these would produce different chemical cocktails. There are sharp orgasms, that are specific, localized, and usually for me result from a mechanical release of tension. The tension I feel comes from living a very detail-oriented, focused, dare I say narrow and constrained approach to reality. I have no panoramic views in my life, very little sense of spaciousenss in environment, deed, or thought. The city life to me is comprised of focus on career goals. All of my work is detail-oriented: as a massage therapist, focus on people's knots and held patterns of tension, their little triggerpoint nodules in their muscle tissue, and in my graphic design work, focus on detailed code programming, exact design measurements, proofreading, wordsmithing. When I live in such a focused and myopic way, my other more expansive qualities become atrophied, and I become more tight and perfectionistic and tense. My life here feels narrow. I miss the big horizons of the desert, the more right-brained forms of awareness, a broad focus that can easily hold all the little details without having to "fix" anything.

Which is why I am so grateful to be studying craniosacral therapy, a truly expansive and spacious modality that allows me to utilize again and exercise my feminine, right-brained awareness. I guess I'm just noticing the extent to which my general stress in life comes from my mourning the fact that I no longer live close to the land, no longer have the refreshing perspective of seeing my life in a bigger context. This mourning I have makes me into somewhat of a tyrant in relationships. When I'm in this state of tension and anxiety about the direction modern life is headed, my hangover is that much stronger.

I wonder if a "spacious" orgasm would leave one with the same hangover as a "constrained" orgasm? I feel like I have more "constrained" orgasms when I'm stressed. When I'm relaxed, the orgasm can brim largely through a deep relaxation into space. The constrained orgasm is fixed down to a small tiny point, is more sharp, and is located very specifically in the groin. The spacious orgasm is opened up to, not driven after, and it expands beyond the self, far out beyond the walls of the room, beyond the city limits, out to meet the horizon.

Not having orgasms makes one more sensitive in general to all sensations. Being more sensitive, then, something as intense as an orgasm can have greater repercussions to the delicate organism.

This is all very technical, but what I'd really like to talk about at some point is love. I've become aware that while I'm quite technically accomplished, I've used these skills almost as a means to avoid receiving love and giving love. Giving pleasure is not necessarily giving love. And I wonder why I hold back so much from receiving love and giving love.

It's come to the point where I see that I have generally made very little effort in my life to really love - that is, to open up beyond my notion of myself, to open up even when feeling closed (especially then); basically, to become curious enough about what could happen if I stopped seeking security of any kind.

I'm grateful to Goldenheart for this challenge.

Comments

Marnia's picture

I appreciate your honesty as well as the fact that you make your own investigations. So far I have not found a "type" of orgasm that lets me avoid the hangover in one form or another, although hangovers do vary in intensity.

Here's a suggestion. Why not try asking your own inner guidance whether skipping orgasm is helping your quest to love or not? I firmly believe that egos are useless in settling such matters. The answer needs to come from beyond the box.

It was through this type of inner quest that I was led to this material in the first place, although I don't usually present the insights here that way. Most people are more comfortable hearing about the neuroscience, personal experiences, or the traditions/recommendations of the past, so I generally start with those points. Yet all those came *after* the initial insight that sexual relationships were somehow a *spiritual* path. As spiritual progress was my top priority, I was open to *anything* that led in that direction. This simplified my choices, and reduced inner conflict.

This reminds me of a discussion I had with a woman who practiced kosher sex for her entire marriage. (In kosher sex, partners sleep in separate beds and do not even hug for close to two weeks of each menstrual cycle - the woman's period, plus 7 days.) She told me, "we do it because God said so, and not for any other reason. The upshot is that it makes the whole ritual of avoiding *and* having sex sacred. In fact, during my pregnancies, when we could have sex whenever we wanted it, something special was temporarily lost. I would look forward to lovemaking on the sabbath because that captured some of the same feeling."

As she spoke, I knew just what she was talking about. I use karezza for the same reason...because I feel like it is part of my spiritual path. (Of course, despite that, I have sometimes experienced orgasm...which is how I learned what helped and what didn't, the neuroscience, and lots about the unsuspected benefits of passing orgasm up. All of that is fascinating to me, and helpful to some others, too. But the real motivation was spiritual, and still is.)

So my suggestion is to find out if, or how, what you're learning about orgasm's effects fits into your spiritual quest. Maybe it does. Maybe it doesn't. Either way, it's likely to clarify your thinking, decrease your conflict about the issue, and make your next step more obvious (whatever it may be).

Gee, have I said that before?...I'm an old man and entitled. Much love to you.

Marnia's picture

you're pretty awesome yourself. *kiss*

I agree that hangovers are the worst after i've abstained for a time. The thing that sold me on this site was that back in December, I abstained for a little over a week, and then had a really intense orgasm, followed by a few days that were simply miserable.
I wasn't aware of all i know now, but when I used to relieve myself daily, I never noticed terrible swings.... then again, I would constantly medicate with sugar, junk food and more orgasms... when I quit the orgasms, thats when I realized how sensitive i really am to sugar, how much orgasm affects me, and how videogames and eating were all a part of self-medicating. I also was constantly unhappy.

This week, after enjoying orgasms again for the first time in months, suicidal thoughts have returned as a daily thing.
By suicidal thoughts, I dont mean contemplating the act, but simply wishing I didn't have to exist, thinking death would be a welcome circumstance, wishing I were never born. I am a man prone to depression, and orgasm triggers it. That is becoming very obvious.
----
to respond to the foot of your post,
I am excited that you are focusing on love. It always comes back to love for me. when I am dysfunctional and at my point of disintegration, what really starts to get to me is the fact that I have so much to offer others, and yet can't seem to keep myself together. I need to love myself. I need to believe that I can.
and the only reason I need to do that is because I firmly believe that my purpose is to be love and express love to others.
I can do that easily when I am fully myself... but I become self-absorbed and blinded to the needs of others when I sense that I am not doing well. I go into a self-preservation mode, and retreat into myself. This robs me of being able to fulfill my true purpose (as i see it), and robs others of experiencing and feeling love from me, affection and attention from me.

and now this seems to come back to this stablizing ability of abstaining from orgasm. I am most fully myself and able to love others when I am not depressed and withdrawn. I am not depressed and withdrawn when I am balanced, and I am balanced with I abstain from orgasm (among other things, like daily yoga, and prayerful mediation).

Best of luck to you, hotspring! please share what you learn about love, and loving.

\---George Washington Hayduke
the light of my eyes is a pearl,
equally emptied to equally shine;
and all or what little joy in the world
seemed suddenly simple, and endlessly mine.
(mewithoutyou)

Thanks all for your feedback. I've been thinking more now in broad terms about how a more goal-oriented life overall causes people to be more obsessive-compulsive and less loving. Having goals and reaching goals makes us feel temporarily secure. Whether that's winning a video game, having an orgasm, making a certain amount of money, "fixing" someone's back problem, reaching a certain level of status, etc - its all dopamine related activity. Deida would probably disagree, he feels men need to be deeply aligned with their purpose in order to be superior men. A purpose in a way implies a goal of some kind, tho I think the achievement of little goals, especially those that society deems particularly worthy or important, could actually detract from the soul's actual purpose. Of course a little stress can be a good thing, and security can be important, and goals are a vital part of that. I guess I just feel that this goal-oriented culture can lead to more aliention, loneliness, and therefore chemical imbalance.

It may seem far-fetched, but i'm beginning to think of my ability to open up to love to be directly correlated to my ability to open up to my divine feminine inclinations in general, which are not so goal oriented and are more spacious and less ambitious. However I can't survive in that mode in this society. So I must embody masculine characteristics even when I have become aware that they are not really my true essence, even though I may embody them well. I've realized some of my orneryness and bitterness in relationships has to do with this constant necesity to continue developing my masculine side to survive, eventhough I just want to be the woman I really am. In times past, women were not given the choice to embody masculine energy. We were not even thought capable of it. Now, we are not given much of a chance to embody feminine energy. See, we can embody masculine energy quite well, but its still not our true essence. So here we are again in a situation in which we have both male and female characteristics, but we don't have much choice as to which we will develop, embody, and explore, unless we are just going to get married, have kids, and stay at home. But many of us can't seem to make this choice because we've invested so much in our masculine qualities, our education, our career. And we're so busy playing the career game that we are hard-pressed to even have the time to date or meet new potential mates who we could settle into our feminine energy with, having babies, etc. This leads me to believe we are at a point in human development right now that in order for us to survive as a species we will need to learn to bring the divine feminine into every sphere of life, into business, politics, etc, and not just in the home life. Jean Shinoda Bolen points to this crucial point in history as a point in which women must come together and utilize their inclusive, collaborative skills out beyond the home to transform society. So, all things said, I guess in the end this could be a dilemma with a potentially exciting and creative solution!

I get the inkling that if I were to make space to cultivate and relish my more right-brained sensibilities, I would be more loving to myself and in my relationships as well. That is, if I did some of the things that Deida suggests men do to really get in touch with the feminine - going on walks in nature, drinking beer! No, for me its smoking weed, a most potent female flower, to counterbalance the masculine energy in my life. Is this a healthy inclination or is it a form of self-medication? Is it in a way a denial that I already AM the divine feminine? I don't REALLY need a drug to remember who I reallly am - a dynamic body of delightful, expansive energy that wants to do a lot more in life than have a meaningful job, and has a lot more to offer than that.

I write all of this this morning after some lovemaking in which I feel very typically masculine. Started making love with the intention of neither of us having orgasms. Ended with a simultaneous orgasm. Then he kept moving and another one just emerged out of the blue. I became so sensitive that he couldn't even touch me without me going into twitches and spasms. I didn't want him to get near me. He said, "You are so closed right now." Indeed I was. He just wanted some closeness. I couldn't give it. My sense is that as much as all these orgasms make him feel like quite the stud, he'd rather have closeness. But there's something about his energy that turns me off, he's so devouring, I feel like I have to put barriers up so I don't get eaten whole.

He's been reading Deida.

I did have a real insight, tho. I realized that he doesn't communicate primarily on a verbal level. I was lying in bed, and instead of trying to communicate with him in my verbal language that I was trying to open up more to him, I just zoomed on down to my heart center and told him telepathically from my heart that I was open to receiving his masculinity, that I supported his full expression of masculinity. I told him through my heart what I needed, and he started to respond immediately with a confident touch, one that didn't feel so clingy and suffocating! See, he thinks and feels and operates from his heart, so that's who i have to converse with, not with his mind. So I am going to start up a regular dialogue between our hearts. It will probably have much the same content than what I would say to him verbally (or perhaps not!), but somehow this is different. I can even see different shapes and colors interacting as they exchange information. His heart is a vivid green color, fresh and vibrant, full of new life.

Marnia's picture

I found this item interesting: "Reduction of Dopamine Level Enhances the Attractiveness of Male Drosophila to Other Males" http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2642723

A number a men here have reported feeling "less masculine" temporarily after lots of orgasm. Gary and I suspect it's due to chronically lowering dopamine (which still spikes in response to new cues...like thinking about porn...but doesn't easily find stable, ideal levels unless one goes through withdrawal completely first).

This may be how orgasm "takes the starch out" of some men. In this item, fruit flies actually become more "attractive" to other males when they have had their dopamine lowered artificially. It stands to reason that they might also be less attractive to women (I've jokingly referred to this as the "wet seaweed factor" when a guy is depleted due to too much masturbation.)

Anyway, the scientists commenting on this phenomenon in fruit flies posed the possibility that lower dopamine actually means the flies send out a different male-attractive, or less-male-aversive, pheromonal message. Goldenheart may be sending off this kind of signal due after too much "destarching," which makes him feel less masculine to you. Just a thought.

I's an interesting theory, but I don't think that's what's going on. He hasn't been masturbating a whole lot in the past year, especially since we've been exploring these ideas. And he's not a porn addict either.

I think he's just basically a really sensitive, gentle guy. Which is what I like about him. But every once in awhile I need a bit of firmness, forthrightness - no, not violence and not jerkiness. I think its really sad that if a woman says she wants something a little different than a soft, gentle man, it's taken to mean she really enjoys being treated poorly. This isn't the case. Being firm and forthright or direct and being sensitive need not be opposites in my mind, they're just a little harder to embody simultaneously sometimes.

He just wants to merge all the time.

Marnia's picture

I wasn't suggesting he was masturbating. I was giving you all the credit for de-starching. smiley

I am still inspired by the fact that 18-year olds and younger teens could, with a few weeks of good, solid bonding (daily bonding behaviors with no draining behaviors), become stronger and more confident across the board. I wonder if that might not prove the key for GH, too. He may sense what he needs and keep asking for what would heal him best and fastest and flip on his inner strength...while you, quite naturally, feel like the neediness will go on forever.

Any chance of trying 3 weeks of generous bonding therapy, without setting off any hangovers in either of you? This may not have been possible due to dream orgasms while your system was calming itself a bit, but it may be possible now.

Yes, I think its clear we need to go back to the bonding behaviors. We're both on the same page about that now. Problem is i get quite pysically turned on by even slow movement in sex. I guess we should go back to no sex and bonding behaviors or completely still sex.

Marnia's picture

Of course, it's a bit like watching paint dry at first.smiley That's why it's good to make the three weeks fun by adding your own creative touches.

I remember that one sweetheart and I both got into my collection of veils to dance for each other one night. It was magical to see him transform such a feminine article of apparel into a wonderful, amazingly masculine whirl of fiery dance...and it was completely silly and spontaneous. Soaking together is good, too.

The Exchanges are minimalist, but you can certainly enhance them without turning to foreplay. Keep yourselves laughing or being creative, and you won't notice the annoyance of the hangover so much. You might find some inspiration here: http://www.reuniting.info/resources/exchange_of_the_day (refresh page to get a new one at random)

Some thoughts on this stuff. First, I think you can have a strong purpose without being goal-oriented. You could be process-oriented, fulfilled in every moment, expansive, still having goals, but they won't be the point. In my own healing process, I had to do this. In the beginning, I *needed* to get well and lived in frustration and anger. Now, though wellness is still the goal, I live more in the present rather than the future, in acceptance of what is, not trying to force my need upon the universe.

Re: Bringing the divine feminine into spheres like business. Hmm... I hope you continue to share your thoughts on this. At this time, it doesn't seem like the right approach to me, but maybe that's just my own close-mindedness. My thought is that masculine things, like business, are best done with masculine energy. My sense of today's society's problem is that the masculine is far too dominant. Feminism, though a good thing, only increased this because now both men and women are masculine. Everyone's a go-getter, an achiever, a fighter. It's made society materialistic also, where the dominant measure of success if material (i.e. financial). That's not how societies used to be.

I don't see this changing though, at least not for a long time. That's why I seek to by-pass it, to create the option of small tribal-like communities that gives people the option of living in modern, masculine, materialistic society or in a more spiritual society. It's the Taoist ideal. Even back in Lao Tzu's day, he already saw the error of large governments. It's like in the movie Apocalypto, where the contrast between the idyllic small tribe vs. the degenerate, "more civilized" people is very clear. However, unlike Lao Tzu, I don't think humankind could ever revert to the old ways. There will always be an escalation of power resulting in larger and larger government. (By "large government" I don't mean the Republican criticism of Democratic policy. I mean a government controlling a large amount of people.) Most people won't want to live this way, but the example will be powerful. Maybe with telecommuting, the small tribe could still participate in the global economy, producing the best of both worlds. This is my personal solution. Maybe others can find ways to reform society from within, but my way is to do it by example and the offer of alternative from without.

Re: Herbina (i.e. weed). Have you read "Be Here Now" by Ram Dass? Substances give you a glimpse, but once the effect wears off, you've gone nowhere. Do I have more social skills now that I've used alcohol as social lubricant? Nope! I was more social just for that time, and now the real work begins to reproduce the energy I had under the influence while sober. Glenn Morris, and I think Chogyam Trungpa talk about this as a practice. Same with LSD and MJ.

It seems to me, Hotspring, that you already have the perfect job. Massage can be an act of love.

Glad to hear GH is reading Deida! Maybe he'll be able to find the part of you that wants to be devoured whole... or maybe it's the neediness of his current devouring that turns you off. Deida says that the surrender of the feminine during sex is what enables the masculine to open also.

Yes, it's the neediness. I love to be devoured whole by someone who's coming from their core. Surrendering is fabulous, its what i long for. But perhaps because he is not confident in his manhood, my feminine doesn't feel it can surrender to him.

Let us know how it goes. We're trying to build a 3rd stage community to support people's growth in this way on spirituallysexy.ning.com, and maybe if he joins, that might breathe new life into it as well as help him at the same time. Frankly, I don't have much hope though, so if you find another Deida group that's more active, let me know.