Experiences in Dual Cultivation
Well, I put out for it and it came to me. I found a partner with who I could practice Dual Cultivation. Its the term I prefer.
The way we started was based on Marnias recommendations in her books, but I found them a little too structured. We were not living together, but managed to spend most of the first two weeks sleeping together and not naked. I cant even say it has been too difficult keeping away from the red zone and avoiding the urge to fertilize.
Its proving to be a really rich relationship. We both have some background in bodywork and other things that may help prepare us. Bits of Yoga, Thai Chi, massage, meditation and Tibetan Pulsing. I suppose thought that the factor which is most effective is the thought paradigm which I have changed in the last year or so. The old idea that "having sex" was the best thing to do has gone. The wondrous fallacy of the orgasm has been shattered and I now see that the old paradigm had very little to do with love. Penetration is not such a compelling essential and too much genital friction takes us away from the gentle relaxation into the excitement zone. Been there too often before, and it goes nowhere!
Sometimes it can seem like two people meditating together. Its similar in many ways. When I find my mind drifting away from the present and going into some story I can just bring my awareness back to the the moment, and the presence of my beloved. Only its easier because the focus is more powerful and compelling. And I can feel my partners response when she feels that I am in the moment with her. It becomes like drinking in her feminine essence and getting the warm fuzzy feel of the old oxytocin coming in. We seem to fall into breathing together easily.
So its early days, only a couple of months together and we are taking it easy. Not living together and no big plans yet. At the moment its easy, possibly aided by a few other neurochemicals that are helping us enjoy each other. But neither does it feel like any kind of toxic high like I have had before. Less lust more love. Time will tell, we are both rather tired of all the failures of relationships we have had in our lives and would like this one to be long and enriching.
- Graham Mason's blog
- Log in or register to post comments



Comments
Wow!
How lovely for you both. Thank you for sharing your experience...and most of all for your open mind(s).
Believe it or not, I don't like structure either. ;-) I think it's better for people to understand the principles and then design their own bonding-behavior based lovemaking...with a slow start. The structure's just there for folks who find it convenient. Even then, I'm sure people tweak it to suit.
Wishing you all the very best.
Structure
Yes, I found it difficult to say "well this is day XX so we should be doing a then b then c". Its a good template, but we are all different in some way. I did find however that the idea of sleeping together clothed for 2 weeks without penetration was excellent. It gives an excellent way of breaking the pattern of meeting someone and engaging in activities where neurochemistry takes over. We could relax into the intimacy of knowing each other beyond groping and heavy breathing. Its a place that is so much sweeter and divine that the compulsive stuff.
I find some of the suggestions in Dianne Richardson's book really good. They help as a way for me to maintain presence which I think is the real key to it all. Keeping the mind in true appreciation of the moment.
Thanks for the tip
Useful for all of us. I like Richardson's work, too.
How?
WARNING: Sexually explicit material below.
These descriptions of people entering new relationships in this new way confuse me. Is something wrong with me because I like the feel of naked skin against mine? That the fleshy softness of a woman's loins delights me, especially when its wetness touches my rock-hard member? That moment is sheer bliss. That I feel loved when she's stroking it? That something just doesn't feel right if I'm not getting any? That our first moment was special because she revealed her body to me and merged with me, and that this wouldn't have happened if we agreed to sleep clothed together for an initial period?
Note: None of the above implies orgasm. That's a temptation too, but it's not one I truly want or need, as irresistable as it is sometimes. These other things, however... it feels wrong to start a relationship another way. Don't get me wrong, I might enjoy going slow in the beginning, but I mean when the time comes to be intimate for the first time.
Maybe not all people have these needs I have? Maybe I'm still working through some issues? Or maybe I'm just too goddamn romantic! ;-)
Living proof...
"Is something wrong with me because I like the feel of naked skin against mine? That the fleshy softness..."
Oh, stop! STOP!!! LOL! :-)
NO ONE is dissing the pleasures of sex!
"and that this wouldn't have happened if we agreed to sleep clothed together for an initial period?"
Are you saying that if you had agreed to sleep clothed together for an initial period, that you never would have gotten around to actually having sex? You would have broken up before then? Why?
I'm living proof that you can jump into bed with a beautiful woman without having sex, and have a wonderful time. My wife-to-be and I got into bed, naked, almost daily, for a month or two before we got married, but we didn't have sex (by my suggestion) until after we got married. I also abstained from masturbating for several weeks before we got married.
I think the point of two-weeks-sleeping-together-clothed-without-sex is to give the bonding program time to take hold and gain dominance over the fertilization program, and to give both partners an opportunity to learn discipline, to be able to resist the temptation to go for orgasm when they finally have sex. It's also a drying-out period, to get over the effects of previous orgasms, so the partners can experience sex without previous orgasms clouding the picture. The clothing just cuts down on the excitement and temptations a little bit. I'd say the clothing isn't necessary if you already have some self-discipline.
I guess I'm really old-fashioned. I want to know my partner pretty well and be committed to each other before having sex with her. On the other hand, my standards are much lower for getting into bed with someone and just cuddling and so on without sex. (I'd prefer that she's not leprous... :-)) So that's where my fantasies run these days - mostly just lying in bed with some beautiful woman, cuddling or gazing lovingly into each others eyes, maybe sometimes practicing karezza, but definitely not going for orgasm. And that's how I want it in real life, too.
Maybe I should call them "visualizations", not "fantasies". :-)
Frankly
I don't see how we humans could do anything but help each other by such snuggling...while we're waiting for balance or a Big Day or whatever.
A slow approach has the added advantage of showing us that what really benefits us in intimacy isn't "just the orgasm."
Who would have thought???
My point
No, we would've gotten around to having sex. ;-) I guess the gist of what I'm trying to ask is if it's wrong to begin a relationship normally before evolving to karezza. That way feels better to me, but this site seems to say we should begin right away with the non-orgasmic bonding and never touch on hot sex at all. I understand why, in theory. It's that if you start off normally, with hot sex, you might not want to stop, and also, the dopamine oscillations will have started, beginning the process of habituation and all that. My feeling, however, is that the honeymoon period, allowed to flow naturally, helps build intimacy, and if interfered with might create resentments and misunderstandings that could negatively affect the budding relationship. That said, one's intention to be non-orgasmic should still be stated up front, so there are no surprises. Things eventually will cool on their own and often evolve into a more quiet, but still good relationship. Then, karezza will be natural and prevent the seven year itch problems. Of course, in Marnia's experience, her relationships never got that far, so for someone with that kind of POIS issues, then insisting on no orgasm from the beginning might be the only way to go.
Well, I think it matters
Well, I think it matters most what works for you. In my case, by the time the "honeymoon period" is over, I'm ready to move on to something new, not to "evolve into a more quiet, but still good relationship." Or, more accurately, I'm ready for therapy. I'm not quite sure yet about the benefits of beginning a relationship with karezza, because I've never done that. The future is wide open. :)
Just out of curiosity, has the above method that you propose, ever worked for you? I've heard other men propose similar ideas here, but none who've actually share their results.
In my experience
starting slow is wise because biology is going to win on occasion anyway. ;-) By beginning with bonding behaviors, you have a more solid base of trust at a subconscious level, which helps see you through when you (inevitably) go through the orgasm cycle. It also helps you to sort what issues are real from issues that are just "post-orgasmic edginess."
Incidentally, I don't consider myself to have POIS. I have never felt the kinds of extreme symptoms those folks report.
At the same time, I think orgasm sets off a neurochemical cycle in all of us. We're just more, or less, aware that our perception and even our sense of well-being is affected. It's a very easy cycle to blame on everything else going on in our lives.
The only way one sees the truth is to compare a few weeks of orgasm-less affection with a couple of weeks of conventional sex. Most people don't make that experiment, so they simply do not see it.
My experience
Well, Discordia, I'll relate my experience, for what it's worth. Before Yvette I had two long term relationships, and they started off with us as friends, hanging out, having fun, and then developed into romance when one night I finally got up the courage to make a move. They each developed problems, and while some might attribute it to orgasm, it still doesn't seem like it to me. After the honeymoon period, there'd be long stretches of no orgasm. We didn't consciously do daily bonding, though, and I can't remember exactly how much bonding we did, just that it did happen. (Probably not enough.) My feeling is that we were simply incompatible. However, the first one went for seven years, the second two, so we remained committed to each other. The relationships, despite their problems, evolved into very close friendships. At the time, I was happy with that, and had there not been problems, I might've stayed with these women for the rest of my life. (At least that's the way I felt with the first one. The second one, I was much older by then and began to realize I needed a woman who I could related to on a spiritual level, meaning she would have to share my interest in delving into the depths of our hearts with me.)
So... these don't really count as proper experiments, but I hope it helps a bit.
With Yvette, now that the honeymoon period is over, we'll see if I can get it back on track with daily bonding behaviors. Not that that's really possible long distance, though, so it is what it is. I'm keeping track of anything I notice during any orgasmic hangover periods. I don't think it was orgasm that caused the problems, but hey, who knows. I'm open. It seemed, however, to come from past baggage we both brought in, in her case fear of being controlled, and in mine, what I call "Good Boy Syndrome" and being willing to accept affection that she doesn't fully want to give.
Marnia, I think that's great advice. I hope there isn't a next time, but if there is, I hope I have the discipline to apply it. With Yvette, I'm doing the experiment now.
Looking forward
to your experiences. Hope it helps!
*big hug*