Prostate health

Marnia's picture

A question about prostate health and non-ejaculatory sex was mentioned in another thread. The belief that men need to ejaculate to avoid prostate trouble is widespread. In the past year or so one study found that frequent intercourse did not prevent prostate trouble, and another claimed that if you are going to ejaculate, more frequently is better than less frequently for prostate health. On the other hand, prostate disease is also associated with high testosterone (high libido) and high prolactin (which shoots up after every orgasm).

The Taoists, with thousands of years of practical experience of ejaculation control, found that non-ejaculatory intercourse improves health. So did the author of "The Karezza Method" (J. William Lloyd). In a sense, the West is measuring "apples," while the Taoists are talking about "oranges." The West is measuring conventional sex in greater or lesser quantities, while the Taoists were gauging frequent sexual activity with an approach that circulates sexual energy without creating frustration. Heart-centered lovemaking increases the quantity of oxytocin in the body, protecting one's health.

A recent study in Italy found that being in love lowers men's testosterone levels a bit, while raising women's, which is good for both partners and increases sexual harmony. Learning how to stay in love may be the best bet for healthy prostate—and gentle, frequent non-performance oriented lovemaking is a good way to do that.

Exercising the prostate is important for good health, but one can exercise it without ejaculating. According to a medical study, prostate trouble seems to be associated with congestion, that is, stagnant blood circulation in the prostate region. Obviously, exercising the muscles in that area during sex is good. (Indeed, gay men seldom have prostate troubles and they typically engage in prostate stimulation). But ejaculation itself is not necessary—making love is. And the gentler that lovemaking the less the potential for unwelcome congestion due to over-arousal (too much blood in the prostate region). One study showed that prostate trouble disproportionately affects priests. But it is not a function of semen build-up; it’s a function of congestion.

As for semen, the body quite naturally stops producing it in uncomfortable quantities when demand decreases, and the body continually reabsorbs any excess.

I have a question, how about

I have a question, how about doing successive masturbation does it has a bad side effect in my health? Can you give me a link related to my question? I'm really addicted in masturbation.

Thanks,

-Jan

Marnia's picture

Sorry about the delay in responding, Jan

Good question. I don't know whether its masturbation, strictly speaking, that is the challenge to your health. I think it's the *addiction.* (That being said, I have heard some really sad stories about men rubbing the skin off of themselves with compulsive masturbation, and I can't think that's a *healthy* thing physically.)

Addiction can definitely be a problem because it sets up cravings and withdrawal periods that affect the decisions you make - in subtle ways that you may not be aware of. For example, you may begin to isolate yourself from other people, in order to have the privacy and time for "scratching your itch."

The companionship of others is actually *much more* healthy than constant orgasm - although you'd never know that from listening to the mainstream media these days.

I'm not sure how good your English is, but I think this article may help you understand better what I'm trying to explain: http://www.reuniting.info/science/natural_reinforcers_sex_food_mind_bend...

Keep asking questions, and I'll try to answer them.